• Sign up for the Daily Digest E-mail
  • X
  • LinkedIn
  • See more results

    Generic selectors
    Exact matches only
    Search in title
    Search in content
    Post Type Selectors

BOE Report

Sign up

See more results

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
  • Home
  • StackDX Intel
  • Headlines
    • Latest Headlines
    • Featured Companies
    • Columns
    • Discussions
  • Well Activity
    • Well Licences
    • Well Activity Map
  • Property Listings
  • Land Sales
  • M&A Activity
    • M&A Database
    • AER Transfers
  • Markets
  • Rig Counts/Data
    • CAOEC Rig Count
    • Baker Hughes Rig Count
    • USA Rig Count
    • Data
      • Canada Oil Market Data
      • Canada NG Market Data
      • USA Market Data
      • Data Downloads
  • Jobs

A look at the valuation of oil sands asset deals

March 14, 20176:05 AM BOE Report Staff

Last week’s massive acquisition of Shell’s oil sands assets by Canadian Natural Resources Limited was purchased at comparable metrics to other oil sands deals according to the BOE Report M&A database.

CNRL paid Shell $11 billion for approximately 188,000 Bbl/d production for deal metrics of $59,000/BOE/d. Canadian Natural’s purchase of Murphy assets (13,800 barrels of production) skewed higher than the play’s average because in addition to buying production, CNRL also bought an interest in the Scottford Refinery. The valuation of the deal between CNRL and Murphy equated to roughly $120,000/BOE/d.

Relative to other western Canadian oil plays, Alberta’s oil sands currently fetch valuations at about the median. Perhaps not fetching valuation’s as high as the Montney formation because of (among other factors) the high cost per barrel to produce. Yet the oil sands still are able to maintain a higher average valuations than other formations which pose greater risk. As many will say, oil sands production is more akin to a stable, long-life manufacturing operation rather than a high netback (and decline) formation.

“Shell’s two agreements with Canadian Natural Resources (CNRL) and Marathon Oil underlines just how serious it is about re-shaping its portfolio around fewer, more advantaged geographies and resource themes,” commented Tom Ellacott, senior vice president of corporate analysis research at Wood Mackenzie. “The nearly US$15 billion of upstream M&A transactions on March 9th [which also includes a couple deals in the United States] were driven by oil and gas companies moving lower down the oil cost curve and leveraging core competencies.”

Canadian Natural Resources Cardium Duvernay Marathon Oil Montney Shell Viking

Follow BOE Report
  • Facebook
  • X
  • LinkedIn

Sign up for the BOE Report Daily Digest E-mail

Successfully subscribed

Latest Headlines
  • Iran says it will waive fees for Hormuz during 60 day negotiation period
  • Oil falls as supply moves through Strait of Hormuz after Iran war pact
  • Iraqi oilfields’ return to normal operations will be gradual, minister says
  • Citi sees oil prices trending lower to $60 to $65 per barrel by first quarter of 2027
  • Alberta government expects $100 payouts to arrive within 2 weeks of applications

Return to Home
Alberta GasMonthly Avg.
CAD/GJ
Market Data by TradingView

    Report Error







    Note: The page you are currently on will be sent with your report. If this report is about a different page, please specify.

    About
    • About BOEReport.com
    • In the News
    • Terms of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Editorial Policy
    Resources
    • Widgets
    • Notifications
    • Daily Digest E-mail
    Get In Touch
    • Advertise
    • Post a Job
    • Contact
    • Report Error
    BOE Network
    © 2026 Stack Technologies Ltd.