• Sign up for the Daily Digest E-mail
  • Facebook
  • X
  • LinkedIn

BOE Report

Sign up
  • Home
  • StackDX Intel
  • Headlines
    • Latest Headlines
    • Featured Companies
    • Columns
    • Discussions
  • Well Activity
    • Well Licences
    • Well Activity Map
  • Property Listings
  • Land Sales
  • M&A Activity
    • M&A Database
    • AER Transfers
  • Markets
  • Rig Counts/Data
    • CAOEC Rig Count
    • Baker Hughes Rig Count
    • USA Rig Count
    • Data
      • Canada Oil Market Data
      • Canada NG Market Data
      • USA Market Data
      • Data Downloads
  • Jobs

Oil producers Canadian Natural, MEG urge regulator to back Trans Mountain request

December 27, 20239:42 AM Reuters0 Comments

Canadian oil producers Canadian Natural Resources and MEG Energy are urging the country’s energy regulator to approve Trans Mountain Corp’s latest request for a change to building its pipeline expansion, saying timely completion is critical.

Canadian Natural and MEG hold long-term contracts to ship crude on the Canadian government-owned Trans Mountain from Alberta to the British Columbia coast.

The long-delayed expansion will nearly triple crude shipments to 890,000 barrels per day once it starts operating, expected by late in the first quarter 2024. Delay risks have pressured Canadian crude prices in recent months.

“If the application is not approved, Canadian Natural and other shippers and in fact the entire energy industry and the governments of Canada and Alberta stand to incur significant losses caused by a delay of up to two years,” Canadian Natural President Tim McKay wrote on Dec. 22 to the Canada Energy Regulator (CER).

Canadian Natural is Canada’s biggest oil producer and has committed to shipping 94,000 barrels per day for 20 years on Trans Mountain, representing 10% of the expanded pipeline’s capacity, McKay said.

Trans Mountain asked the CER’s permission to install smaller-diameter pipe in a 1.4-mile (2.3-km) section of the pipeline’s route after encountering challenging drilling conditions in a mountainous area between Hope and Chilliwack, British Columbia.

The CER denied that request Dec. 5. Trans Mountain then asked the regulator to reverse its decision by Jan. 9, warning of a “catastrophic” two-year delay and billions of dollars in losses.

The CER last week denied Trans Mountain’s variance request, citing concerns about pipeline integrity and the environment. It is reviewing Trans Mountain’s latest application.

In a Dec. 24 letter, Tim Takaro, Simon Fraser University professor emeritus of health sciences who has protested the project, urged the CER to take more time to make its decision. He cited risks of any pipeline leak to destroying salmon-spawning grounds in the Fraser River and to shutting down a nearby national highway.

(Reporting by Rod Nickel in Winnipeg, Manitoba; Editing by David Gregorio)

Canadian Natural Resources MEG Energy

Follow BOE Report
  • Facebook
  • X
  • LinkedIn

Sign up for the BOE Report Daily Digest E-mail

Successfully subscribed

Latest Headlines
  • Energy Transfer Announces Suspension of Development of Lake Charles LNG
  • Putin to talk of war and peace at marathon news conference
  • Cygnet Energy Ltd. and Kiwetinohk Energy Corp. Announce Completion of Arrangement
  • Saudi Arabia crude exports rise to two-and-a-half year high in October
  • Why Canada’s hottest shale play is catching the eye of US producers

Return to Home
Alberta GasMonthly Avg.
CAD/GJ
Market Data by TradingView

    Report Error







    Note: The page you are currently on will be sent with your report. If this report is about a different page, please specify.

    About
    • About BOEReport.com
    • In the News
    • Terms of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Editorial Policy
    Resources
    • Widgets
    • Notifications
    • Daily Digest E-mail
    Get In Touch
    • Advertise
    • Post a Job
    • Contact
    • Report Error
    BOE Network
    © 2025 Stack Technologies Ltd.