• Sign up for the Daily Digest E-mail
  • X
  • LinkedIn
  • See more results

    Generic selectors
    Exact matches only
    Search in title
    Search in content
    Post Type Selectors

BOE Report

Sign up

See more results

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
  • Home
  • StackDX Intel
  • Headlines
    • Latest Headlines
    • Featured Companies
    • Columns
    • Discussions
  • Well Activity
    • Well Licences
    • Well Activity Map
  • Property Listings
  • Land Sales
  • M&A Activity
    • M&A Database
    • AER Transfers
  • Markets
  • Rig Counts/Data
    • CAOEC Rig Count
    • Baker Hughes Rig Count
    • USA Rig Count
    • Data
      • Canada Oil Market Data
      • Canada NG Market Data
      • USA Market Data
      • Data Downloads
  • Jobs

Up to $9B could be lost if Keystone cancelled

May 28, 20138:28 AM BOE Report Staff

keystone xl

TORONTO (Canadian Press) – A Canadian bank estimates that the cancellation or a continuing delay of the Keystone XL pipeline could endanger more than $9 billion of oilsands investment over the next seven years.

RBC Dominion Securities — part of the group that includes Royal Bank of Canada (TSX:RY) — says a negative decision on the pipeline would be felt by construction, engineering and project management companies, among others

It estimates the financial hit would be somewhere between $8 billion and $10 billion, but does not specify how it arrived at its final estimate of $9.4 billion.

Since most of the pipeline is being constructed in the United States, RBC Dominion says contractors in Canada will be affected less.

The proposed pipeline — which has faced stiff opposition by environmental groups and some land owners — would bring 700,000 barrels of oilsands crude a day from Alberta through six states and to Gulf Coast refineries.

Because it crosses an international border, Keystone XL requires U.S. presidential approval as well as approval from the U.S. State Department.

The Canadian and Alberta governments have staunchly supported Keystone XL as a way to reach an important market but President Barack Obama has yet to make a final decision.

The Obama administration rejected an earlier iteration of the Keystone XL project — which would have run from Hardisty, Alta., to the Texas coast — last year because of environmental concerns in Nebraska.

The company responded by breaking up the project into two parts and going ahead with the southern leg between Oklahoma and the U.S. Gulf Coast, which does not require presidential approval. That US$2.6-billion project is about 70 per cent complete and on track to start delivering crude late this year.

Keystone XL TransCanada

Follow BOE Report
  • Facebook
  • X
  • LinkedIn

Sign up for the BOE Report Daily Digest E-mail

Successfully subscribed

Latest Headlines
  • Iran will halt attacks as long as US maintains pause, Iranian source says after Trump calls off strikes
  • Five things to watch for in the Canadian business world in the coming week
  • Iran war spreads to Red Sea and Caspian, Gulf quiet as US forgoes strikes
  • Missiles targeting Saudi oil refineries shot down, sources say
  • Kuwait’s KPC signs $16 billion lease and leaseback deal for oil pipeline network

Return to Home
Alberta GasMonthly Avg.
CAD/GJ
Market Data by TradingView

    Report Error







    Note: The page you are currently on will be sent with your report. If this report is about a different page, please specify.

    About
    • About BOEReport.com
    • In the News
    • Terms of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Editorial Policy
    Resources
    • Widgets
    • Notifications
    • Daily Digest E-mail
    Get In Touch
    • Advertise
    • Post a Job
    • Contact
    • Report Error
    StackDX
    • BOE Report Jobs
    • StackDX Intel
    © 2026 Stack Technologies Ltd.