• Sign up for the Daily Digest E-mail
  • Facebook
  • X
  • LinkedIn

BOE Report

Sign up
  • Home
  • StackDX Intel
  • Headlines
    • Latest Headlines
    • Featured Companies
    • Columns
    • Discussions
  • Well Activity
    • Well Licences
    • Well Activity Map
  • Property Listings
  • Land Sales
  • M&A Activity
    • M&A Database
    • AER Transfers
  • Markets
  • Rig Counts/Data
    • CAOEC Rig Count
    • Baker Hughes Rig Count
    • USA Rig Count
    • Data
      • Canada Oil Market Data
      • Canada NG Market Data
      • USA Market Data
      • Data Downloads
  • Jobs

NEB: No serious Enbridge control room issues

June 10, 20138:10 PM BOE Report Staff

CP

 

CALGARY – The National Energy Board says its inspection of Enbridge’s control room operations has found no serious issues, but that it’s ordering a third-party audit to take a closer look.

“The board did not identify any non-compliances with its regulations that would pose an immediate hazard to public safety or the environment,” the national energy watchdog said in a report released Monday.

The inspections last August and September were meant to assess improvements Enbridge had made since a high-profile oil spill in Marshall, Mich., nearly three years ago.

In July 2010, some three million litres of crude leaked from a ruptured pipeline into nearby wetlands and eventually the Kalamazoo River.

A scathing report by the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board last summer likened Enbridge’s handling of the incident to the “Keystone Kops,” the bumbling policemen of silent films.

Because many of the improvements since the spill hadn’t yet been implemented, the NEB is demanding a third-party audit to “fully examine Enbridge’s management system, any human factors associated with control room operation and the safety culture of the organization as a whole.”

The third-party auditor will be directly accountable to the NEB and the energy regulator will set the parameters of the audit.

The board says issues related to management systems, human factors and team performance in the Enbridge control room in Edmonton directly contributed to the severity of the Michigan spill.

The NTSB report released last year honed in on those factors as well. The U.S. watchdog said it took 17 hours and 19 minutes for Enbridge staff to respond to alarms signalling a problem on the line in southern Michigan. And when they did respond, it was only after a worker with a local natural gas utility informed them of the spill.

Instead of stopping the flow, Enbridge staff misinterpreted the alarms and twice pumped more crude into the ruptured pipeline — representing about 81 per cent of the total spill.

The NTSB also took Enbridge to task for failing to fix a defect on the pipeline after it had been discovered five years earlier.

Enbridge Keystone XL

Follow BOE Report
  • Facebook
  • X
  • LinkedIn

Sign up for the BOE Report Daily Digest E-mail

Successfully subscribed

Latest Headlines
  • Venture Global cashes in on exports from Plaquemines LNG plant, SEC filing shows
  • Journey Energy Inc. Provides Encouraging Results from Its First Three 2025 Duvernay Wells
  • US proposes rules that could boost oil, gas output in US West
  • Ontario Premier Doug Ford pitches railway to Ring of Fire, Alberta is on board
  • Alberta to hold nuclear power consultations as reactor companies weigh opportunities

Return to Home
Alberta GasMonthly Avg.
CAD/GJ
Market Data by TradingView

    Report Error







    Note: The page you are currently on will be sent with your report. If this report is about a different page, please specify.

    About
    • About BOEReport.com
    • In the News
    • Terms of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Editorial Policy
    Resources
    • Widgets
    • Notifications
    • Daily Digest E-mail
    Get In Touch
    • Advertise
    • Post a Job
    • Contact
    • Report Error
    BOE Network
    © 2025 Stack Technologies Ltd.