• Sign up for the Daily Digest E-mail
  • X
  • LinkedIn
  • See more results

    Generic selectors
    Exact matches only
    Search in title
    Search in content
    Post Type Selectors

BOE Report

Sign up

See more results

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
  • Home
  • StackDX Intel
  • Headlines
    • Latest Headlines
    • Featured Companies
    • Columns
    • Discussions
  • Well Activity
    • Well Licences
    • Well Activity Map
  • Property Listings
  • Land Sales
  • M&A Activity
    • M&A Database
    • AER Transfers
  • Markets
  • Rig Counts/Data
    • CAOEC Rig Count
    • Baker Hughes Rig Count
    • USA Rig Count
    • Data
      • Canada Oil Market Data
      • Canada NG Market Data
      • USA Market Data
      • Data Downloads
  • Jobs

Crude focus of deadly railway crash, but far more chemicals transported by rail

July 10, 20139:39 AM BOE Report Staff

CP

 

MONTREAL – The explosive railway crash in Lac Megantic, Que., has put the focus on the growing transportation of crude oil, but far more hazardous materials, including dangerous chemical compounds, are transported near Canadian communities.

Canadian railway companies shipped 86,000 carloads of petroleum products in the second quarter, up 18 per cent from last year and 62 per cent from 2011.

But railways transported 154,000 carloads of chemicals during the recent period, 79 per cent more than the material that forever changed a small Quebec town.

Fifteen people have been confirmed dead and about 60 are missing following Saturday’s early morning derailment, explosions and fire that devastated parts of the town.

Cameron Doerksen of National Bank Financial says some of these chemicals are even more dangerous than crude, which has come under increased scrutiny about the safety of hauling such material by rail.

Any movement to limit the shipments of crude by rail would also hit the transportation of chemicals and create a potentially more dangerous alternative of transporting the materials by truck, he said.

Doerksen says transporting hazardous materials by rail is not perfect, but it is generally safe.

The Lac Megantic disaster could prompt additional safety measures, including regulations to upgrade tank cars to more modern standards. Tank cars used in hauling crude are generally owned by oil producers and refiners, not the railways.

However, Doerksen said he doesn’t expect new safety regulations will be overly burdensome to the country’s two largest railways — Canadian National (TSX:CNR) and Canadian Pacific (TSX:CP). Incremental costs could be recovered by higher pricing.

While transportation of crude by rail is the fastest growing segment for both railways, he said it will represent only three to five per cent of CN’s revenues by year end and seven to 10 per cent of CP revenues.

Crude by Rail

Follow BOE Report
  • Facebook
  • X
  • LinkedIn

Sign up for the BOE Report Daily Digest E-mail

Successfully subscribed

Latest Headlines
  • Oil shipments rise in Hormuz although questions grow over Iran’s transit terms
  • Brent physical, paper prices slip further as Hormuz flows rise, traders say
  • Asia spot LNG at four-month low as Hormuz flows restart, upside risk remains
  • Supported Take-Over Bid of Burgess Creek Exploration Inc. Deposit Period News Release
  • Iran says it will waive fees for Hormuz during 60 day negotiation period

Return to Home
Alberta GasMonthly Avg.
CAD/GJ
Market Data by TradingView

    Report Error







    Note: The page you are currently on will be sent with your report. If this report is about a different page, please specify.

    About
    • About BOEReport.com
    • In the News
    • Terms of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Editorial Policy
    Resources
    • Widgets
    • Notifications
    • Daily Digest E-mail
    Get In Touch
    • Advertise
    • Post a Job
    • Contact
    • Report Error
    BOE Network
    © 2026 Stack Technologies Ltd.