• Sign up for the Daily Digest E-mail
  • Facebook
  • X
  • LinkedIn

BOE Report

Sign up
  • Home
  • StackDX Intel
  • Headlines
    • Latest Headlines
    • Featured Companies
    • Columns
    • Discussions
  • Well Activity
    • Well Licences
    • Well Activity Map
  • Property Listings
  • Land Sales
  • M&A Activity
    • M&A Database
    • AER Transfers
  • Markets
  • Rig Counts/Data
    • CAOEC Rig Count
    • Baker Hughes Rig Count
    • USA Rig Count
    • Data
      • Canada Oil Market Data
      • Canada NG Market Data
      • USA Market Data
      • Data Downloads
  • Jobs

WoodMac: Key trends in Canada’s oilsands

October 19, 201611:02 AM Wood Mackenzie0 Comments

Fort Hills oilsands siteCanada’s oil sands hold a massive known resource base of 170 billion recoverable barrels. Wood Mackenzie’s oil sands key play report breaks down the projects to the phase level to understand what makes the sector tick. A total of 81 phases, covering 35 projects, are assessed and benchmarked to understand the opportunities as well as the risks.

Below are key points from WoodMac’s analysis:

Production growth slows post-2020

Wood Mackenzie forecasts commercial projects to approach 3.5 million b/d of production in 2020. Production growth after 2020 slows due to delays in sanctioning new projects and expansions due to low oil prices

High breakevens for new projects

New in-situ projects and phases breakeven between US$55/bbl to US$70/bbl, while producing SAGD projects breakeven between US$30/bbl to US$45/bbl. Existing mining projects all have breakevens below US$50/bbl. Wood Mackenzie does not anticipate any new mining projects in our forecast apart from Fort Hills.

Large operators dominate the competitive landscape

Focused operators such as Suncor, CNRL, Cenovus, and Imperial Oil derive greater than 70% of their portfolio value from the oil sands. Pure play operators such as MEG Energy are also making an impact in the sector through their focused expertise.

Market access remains a concern

Rail infrastructure has close to tripled since 2014 and Wood Mackenzie continues to see rail playing a role. Our long term view is that Energy East and the Trans Mountain Expansion will ultimately progress and relieve infrastructure bottlenecks. Further delays or cancellations of these projects could severely impact takeaway capacity and increase the WCS differential in the future.

The current project pipeline is sparse

If oil price weakness persists, the level of achievable cost control, project management expertise and each company’s level of portfolio optionality will dictate the pace of development of new projects and phases.

 

Cenovus Imperial Oil MEG Energy Suncor

Follow BOE Report
  • Facebook
  • X
  • LinkedIn

Sign up for the BOE Report Daily Digest E-mail

Successfully subscribed

Latest Headlines
  • Senate Democrats blast Trump for failing to use sanctions to pressure Russia
  • Journey Energy Inc. Announces Year-End 2025 Reserves, Achieves Record Net Asset Value of $1 Billion or $14.17 per Fully Diluted Share
  • Pulse Seismic Inc. Reports 2025 Financial Results and Declares Regular and Special Dividends
  • New oil and gas jobs from BOE Report Jobs
  • Alberta challenge to federal project review law being heard in court, again

Return to Home
Alberta GasMonthly Avg.
CAD/GJ
Market Data by TradingView

    Report Error







    Note: The page you are currently on will be sent with your report. If this report is about a different page, please specify.

    About
    • About BOEReport.com
    • In the News
    • Terms of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Editorial Policy
    Resources
    • Widgets
    • Notifications
    • Daily Digest E-mail
    Get In Touch
    • Advertise
    • Post a Job
    • Contact
    • Report Error
    BOE Network
    © 2026 Stack Technologies Ltd.