• Sign up for the Daily Digest E-mail
  • X
  • LinkedIn
  • See more results

    Generic selectors
    Exact matches only
    Search in title
    Search in content
    Post Type Selectors

BOE Report

Sign up

See more results

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
  • Home
  • StackDX Intel
  • Headlines
    • Latest Headlines
    • Featured Companies
    • Columns
    • Discussions
  • Well Activity
    • Well Licences
    • Well Activity Map
  • Property Listings
  • Land Sales
  • M&A Activity
    • M&A Database
    • AER Transfers
  • Markets
  • Rig Counts/Data
    • CAOEC Rig Count
    • Baker Hughes Rig Count
    • USA Rig Count
    • Data
      • Canada Oil Market Data
      • Canada NG Market Data
      • USA Market Data
      • Data Downloads
  • Jobs

Dakota Access pipeline expected to begin shipping Thursday

May 31, 20172:06 PM The Associated Press0 Comments

BISMARCK, N.D. – The developer of the Dakota Access oil pipeline, which is expected to begin shipping oil on Thursday, will face scrutiny later this summer on whether it violated North Dakota rules during construction.

The three-member North Dakota Public Service Commission is looking into whether Texas-based Energy Transfer Partners removed too many trees and shrubs along the pipeline route, and whether it improperly reported the discovery of Native American artifacts. No artifacts were disturbed.

ETP maintains it didn’t intentionally do anything wrong in either case. If the commission ultimately decides differently, the company could be subject to tens of thousands of dollars in fines, though it could fight them in state court.

Regulators decided during a Wednesday meeting to hold the hearings on back-to-back days in either July or August. A decision on fines would come sometime after that.

“I’m pretty eager to wrap this us,” Commissioner Julie Fedorchak said.

The $3.8 billion pipeline will move North Dakota oil through South Dakota and Iowa to a distribution point in Illinois. The developer of the Dakota Access oil pipeline will face hearings in North Dakota later this summer on whether it violated state rules during construction.

The pipeline prompted hundreds and sometimes thousands of Native American and environmental activists to camp in North Dakota to protest, saying it would disturb sacred sites and could pollute water used by Native Americans. President Donald Trump’s administration and the courts eventually allowed the pipeline to be completed.

The three-member Public Service Commission is looking into whether Texas-based Energy Transfer Partners removed too many trees and shrubs along the pipeline route, and whether it improperly reported the discovery of Native American artifacts. No artifacts were disturbed.

ETP maintains it didn’t intentionally do anything wrong in either case. If the PSC ultimately decides differently, the company could be subject to tens of thousands of dollars in fines, though it could fight them in state court.

Regulators decided during a Wednesday meeting to hold the hearings on back-to-back days in either July or August. A decision on fines would come sometime after that.

“I’m pretty eager to wrap this us,” Commissioner Julie Fedorchak said.

The $3.8 billion pipeline will move North Dakota oil through South Dakota and Iowa to a distribution point in Illinois. The company said earlier this month that it would begin shipping oil on June 1 to meet contracts with shippers.

The commission maintains the company diverted construction of the pipeline around artifacts last October without first running the plan by the commission, as required. The company did get clearance from the State Historic Preservation Office and maintains it acted in good faith.

In addition, a third-party inspector identified 83 sites along the 380-mile (610-kilometre) pipeline corridor in North Dakota where trees or shrubs might have been cleared in violation of the commission’s orders. Says it did nothing wrong, and the company has a plan to plant two trees for every one removed — a total of about 94,000 trees.

“The reason we have regulations regarding trees and shrubs in North Dakota is that they’re hard to grow, especially in western North Dakota,” Fedorchak said.

___

Follow Blake Nicholson on Twitter at: http://twitter.com/

Follow BOE Report
  • Facebook
  • X
  • LinkedIn

Sign up for the BOE Report Daily Digest E-mail

Successfully subscribed

Latest Headlines
  • Iran will halt attacks as long as US maintains pause, Iranian source says after Trump calls off strikes
  • Five things to watch for in the Canadian business world in the coming week
  • Iran war spreads to Red Sea and Caspian, Gulf quiet as US forgoes strikes
  • Missiles targeting Saudi oil refineries shot down, sources say
  • Kuwait’s KPC signs $16 billion lease and leaseback deal for oil pipeline network

Return to Home
Alberta GasMonthly Avg.
CAD/GJ
Market Data by TradingView

    Report Error







    Note: The page you are currently on will be sent with your report. If this report is about a different page, please specify.

    About
    • About BOEReport.com
    • In the News
    • Terms of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Editorial Policy
    Resources
    • Widgets
    • Notifications
    • Daily Digest E-mail
    Get In Touch
    • Advertise
    • Post a Job
    • Contact
    • Report Error
    StackDX
    • BOE Report Jobs
    • StackDX Intel
    © 2026 Stack Technologies Ltd.