• Sign up for the Daily Digest E-mail
  • X
  • LinkedIn
  • See more results

    Generic selectors
    Exact matches only
    Search in title
    Search in content
    Post Type Selectors

BOE Report

Sign up

See more results

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
  • Home
  • StackDX Intel
  • Headlines
    • Latest Headlines
    • Featured Companies
    • Columns
    • Discussions
  • Well Activity
    • Well Licences
    • Well Activity Map
  • Property Listings
  • Land Sales
  • M&A Activity
    • M&A Database
    • AER Transfers
  • Markets
  • Rig Counts/Data
    • CAOEC Rig Count
    • Baker Hughes Rig Count
    • USA Rig Count
    • Data
      • Canada Oil Market Data
      • Canada NG Market Data
      • USA Market Data
      • Data Downloads
  • Jobs

Vermilion Energy Inc. Announces 2017 Year-End Summary Reserves and Resource Information

March 1, 201812:44 PM CNW

CALGARY, March 1, 2018 /CNW/ – Vermilion Energy Inc. (“Vermilion”, the “Company”, “We” or “Our”) (TSX, NYSE: VET) is pleased to announce summary 2017 year-end reserves and resource information.  The estimates of reserves and resources and other oil and gas information contained in this news release have been estimated by GLJ Petroleum Consultants Ltd. (“GLJ”) effective as at December 31, 2017 and prepared in accordance with National Instrument 51-101 “Standards of Disclosure for Oil and Gas Activities” of the Canadian Securities Administrators (“NI 51-101”) and the Canadian Oil and Gas Evaluation Handbook (“COGEH”).  For additional information about Vermilion, including Vermilion’s statement of reserves data and other information in Form 51-101F1, report on reserves data by independent qualified reserves evaluator or auditor in Form 51-101F2 and report of management and directors on oil and gas disclosure in Form 51-101F3, please review the Company’s Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2017, to be filed on March 1, 2018 and available on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and on the SEC’s EDGAR system at www.sec.gov/edgar.shtml.

HIGHLIGHTS

  • Total proved (“1P”) reserves increased by 0.5% to 176.6 mmboe, while total proved plus probable (“2P”) reserves increased 3% to 298.5 mmboe. We replaced 103% and 134% of production at the 1P and 2P levels respectively in 2017.
  • Finding and Development (“F&D”)(2) and Finding, Development and Acquisition (“FD&A”)(2) costs, including Future Development Capital (“FDC”) for 2017 on a 2P basis increased to $10.57/boe and $11.24/boe, compared to $5.57/boe and $6.62/boe in 2016, respectively. Our three-year F&D and FD&A costs, including FDC, on a 2P basis were $8.23/boe and $8.87/boe, respectively. The largest driver of the increase in F&D cost was the strengthening of the Euro relative to the Canadian dollar in GLJ’s foreign exchange rate forecast as compared to the previous year, which increased FDC for our European properties. Operating Recycle Ratio(3) (including FDC) was 2.8x in 2017.
  • Proved Developed Producing (“PDP”) reserves increased by 1.3% to 123.8 mmboe at an average F&D cost (including FDC) of $12.41/boe resulting in a PDP Operating Recycle Ratio(3) (including FDC) of 2.4x. PDP reserves represent 70% of 1P reserves.
  • At year-end 2017, 2P reserves were comprised of 29% Brent-based light crude, 15% North American-based light crude, 12% natural gas liquids, 19% European natural gas and 25% North American natural gas.
  • We continued to build our strong resource base in our West Pembina area in Alberta. We added 29 (23.9 net) 2P locations in the condensate-rich portion of the Mannville gas play in West Pembina at an average reserves addition per well of approximately 520 mboe. The West Pembina-Mannville reserves are Vermilion’s largest resource base, representing over 40% of total Canadian 2P reserves at December 31, 2017.
  • In the Ferrier area of Alberta we added nine (7.1 net) 2P locations in the liquids-rich Mannville gas play at an average reserve addition per well of approximately 1,100 mboe.
  • Our independent GLJ 2017 Resource Assessment(4) indicates risked low, best, and high estimates for contingent resources in the Development Pending category of 107.3(4) mmboe, 176.7(4) mmboe, and 253.6(4)mmboe, respectively. The GLJ 2017 Resource Assessment also indicates risked low, best, and high estimates for contingent resources in the Development Unclarified category of 7.5(4) mmboe, 32.8(4) mmboe, and 46.1(4)mmboe, respectively. Over 80% of our risked contingent resources reside in the Development Pending category. Prospective resources were assessed at risked low, best and high estimates of 51.5(4) mmboe, 153.4(4)mmboe, and 260.4(4) mmboe. Our contingent and prospective resource bases remain a source of reserve additions, with 20.5 mmboe of contingent resources and 1.7 mmboe of prospective resources converted to 2P reserves during 2017.

(1)

As evaluated by GLJ Petroleum Consultants Ltd. (“GLJ”) in a report dated February 1, 2018 with an effective date of December 31, 2017.

(2)

F&D (finding and development) and FD&A (finding, development and acquisition) costs are used as a measure of capital efficiency and are calculated by dividing the applicable capital expenditures for the period, including the change in undiscounted future development capital (“FDC”), by the change in the reserves, incorporating revisions and production, for the same period.

(3)

“Operating Recycle Ratio” is a measure of capital efficiency calculated by dividing the Operating Netback by the cost of adding reserves (F&D cost).  “Operating Netback” is calculated as sales less royalties, operating expense, transportation costs, PRRT and realized hedging gains and losses presented on a per unit basis.

(4)

Vermilion retained GLJ to conduct an independent resource evaluation dated February 1, 2018 to assess contingent and prospective resources across all of the Company’s key operating regions with an effective date of December 31, 2017 (the “GLJ 2017 Resource Assessment”).  The aggregate associated chance of development for each of the low, best and high estimate for contingent resources in the Development Pending category are 84%, 83% and 82%, respectively.  The aggregate associated chance of development for each of the low, best and high estimate for contingent resources in the Development Unclarified category are 56%, 46% and 47%, respectively.  The aggregate associated chance of commerciality for each of the low, best and high estimate for prospective resources in the Prospect category are 23%, 22% and 22%, respectively.  There is uncertainty that it will be commercially viable to produce any portion of the resources.  For further information, see the “Contingent Resources” section of this news release.

 

DISCLAIMER

Certain statements included or incorporated by reference in this news release may constitute forward looking statements or financial outlooks under applicable securities legislation.  Such forward looking statements or information typically contain statements with words such as “anticipate”, “believe”, “expect”, “plan”, “intend”, “estimate”, “propose”, or similar words suggesting future outcomes or statements regarding an outlook.  Forward looking statements or information in this news release may include, but are not limited to:

  • capital expenditures;
  • business strategies and objectives;
  • estimated reserve quantities and the discounted present value of future net cash flows from such reserves;
  • petroleum and natural gas sales;
  • future production levels (including the timing thereof) and rates of average annual production growth, estimated contingent resources and prospective resources;
  • exploration and development plans;
  • acquisition and disposition plans and the timing thereof;
  • operating and other expenses, including the payment of future dividends;
  • royalty and income tax rates;
  • the timing of regulatory proceedings and approvals; and
  • the estimate of Vermilion’s share of the expected natural gas production from the Corrib field.

Such forward-looking statements or information are based on a number of assumptions all or any of which may prove to be incorrect.  In addition to any other assumptions identified in this document, assumptions have been made regarding, among other things:

  • the ability of the Company to obtain equipment, services and supplies in a timely manner to carry out its activities in Canada and internationally;
  • the ability of the Company to market crude oil, natural gas liquids and natural gas successfully to current and new customers;
  • the timing and costs of pipeline and storage facility construction and expansion and the ability to secure adequate product transportation;
  • the timely receipt of required regulatory approvals;
  • the ability of the Company to obtain financing on acceptable terms;
  • foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates;
  • future crude oil, natural gas liquids and natural gas prices; and
  • Management’s expectations relating to the timing and results of development activities.

Although the Company believes that the expectations reflected in such forward looking statements or information are reasonable, undue reliance should not be placed on forward looking statements because the Company can give no assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct.  Financial outlooks are provided for the purpose of understanding the Company’s financial strength and business objectives and the information may not be appropriate for other purposes.  Forward looking statements or information are based on current expectations, estimates and projections that involve a number of risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated by the Company and described in the forward looking statements or information.  These risks and uncertainties include but are not limited to:

  • the ability of management to execute its business plan;
  • the risks of the oil and gas industry, both domestically and internationally, such as operational risks in exploring for, developing and producing crude oil, natural gas liquids and natural gas;
  • risks and uncertainties involving geology of crude oil, natural gas liquids and natural gas deposits;
  • risks inherent in the Company’s marketing operations, including credit risk;
  • the uncertainty of reserves estimates and reserves life and estimates of resources and associated expenditures;
  • the uncertainty of estimates and projections relating to production, costs and expenses;
  • potential delays or changes in plans with respect to exploration or development projects or capital expenditures;
  • the Company’s ability to enter into or renew leases on acceptable terms;
  • fluctuations in crude oil, natural gas liquids and natural gas prices, foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates;
  • health, safety and environmental risks;
  • uncertainties as to the availability and cost of financing;
  • the ability of the Company to add production and reserves through exploration and development activities;
  • general economic and business conditions;
  • the possibility that government policies or laws may change or governmental approvals may be delayed or withheld;
  • uncertainty in amounts and timing of royalty payments;
  • risks associated with existing and potential future law suits and regulatory actions against the Company; and
  • other risks and uncertainties described elsewhere in the annual information form of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2017 or in the Company’s other filings with Canadian securities authorities.

The forward-looking statements or information contained in this news release are made as of the date hereof and the Company undertakes no obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking statements or information, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, unless required by applicable securities laws.

RESERVES, FUTURE NET REVENUE AND OTHER OIL AND GAS INFORMATION

The following is a summary of the oil and natural gas reserves and the value of future net revenue of Vermilion as evaluated by GLJ, independent petroleum engineering consultants in Calgary in a report dated February 1, 2018with an effective date of December 31, 2017 (the “GLJ 2017 Reserves Evaluation”).  The GLJ 2017 Reserves Evaluation was prepared in accordance with National Instrument 51-101 and COGEH.

Reserves and other oil and gas information in this news release is effective December 31, 2017 unless otherwise stated.

All evaluations of future net production revenue set forth in the tables below are stated after overriding and lessor royalties, Crown royalties, freehold royalties, mineral taxes, direct lifting costs, normal allocated overhead and future capital investments, including abandonment and reclamation obligations.  Future net production revenues estimated by the GLJ 2017 Reserves Evaluation do not represent the fair market value of the reserves.  Other assumptions relating to the costs, prices for future production and other matters are included in the GLJ 2017 Reserve Evaluation.  There is no assurance that the future price and cost assumptions used in the GLJ 2017 Reserves Evaluation will prove accurate and variances could be material.

Reserves for Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, the Netherlands and the United States are established using deterministic methodology.  Total proved reserves are established at the 90 percent probability (P90) level.  There is a 90 percent probability that the actual reserves recovered will be equal to or greater than the P90 reserves.  Total proved plus probable reserves are established at the 50 percent probability (P50) level.  There is a 50 percent probability that the actual reserves recovered will be equal to or greater than the P50 reserves.

Estimates of reserves have been made assuming that development of each property, in respect of which estimates have been made, will occur without regard to the availability of funding required for that development.

With respect to finding and development costs, the aggregate of the exploration and development costs incurred in the most recent financial year and the change during that year in estimated future development costs generally will not reflect total finding and development costs related to reserve additions for that year.

Pricing used in the forecast price estimates is set forth in the table below and referenced in the notes to subsequent tables.

Table 1: Forecast Prices used in Estimates (1)

Light Crude Oil and
& Medium Crude Oil

Crude Oil

Conventional
Natural Gas
Canada

Conventional
Natural Gas
Europe

Natural Gas
Liquids

Inflation
Rate

Exchange
Rate

Exchange
Rate

Year

WTI
Cushing
Oklahoma
($US/bbl)

Edmonton
Par Price
40? API
($Cdn/bbl)

Cromer
Medium
29.3? API
($Cdn/bbl)

Brent Blend
FOB
North Sea
($US/bbl)

AECO
Gas Price
($Cdn/MMBtu)

National Balancing
Point
(UK)
($US/MMBtu)

FOB
Field Gate
($Cdn/bbl)

Percent
Per Year

($US/$Cdn)

($Cdn/EUR)

2017

50.88

62.78

59.90

54.16

2.16

5.63

46.67

1.60

0.77

1.46

Forecast

2018

59.00

70.25

65.34

65.50

2.20

6.25

56.85

2.00

0.79

1.49

2019

59.00

70.25

65.34

63.50

2.54

6.50

53.46

2.00

0.79

1.46

2020

60.00

70.31

65.39

63.00

2.88

6.75

53.18

2.00

0.80

1.44

2021

66.00

72.84

67.74

66.00

3.24

7.00

54.74

2.00

0.81

1.42

2022

69.00

75.61

70.32

69.00

3.47

7.15

56.37

2.00

0.82

1.40

2023

72.00

78.31

72.83

72.00

3.58

7.30

58.31

2.00

0.83

1.39

2024

75.00

81.93

76.19

75.00

3.66

7.45

60.94

2.00

0.83

1.39

2025

78.00

85.54

79.55

78.00

3.73

7.60

63.57

2.00

0.83

1.39

2026

80.33

88.35

82.16

80.33

3.80

7.75

65.61

2.00

0.83

1.39

2027

81.88

90.22

83.90

81.88

3.88

7.90

66.96

2.00

0.83

1.39

Thereafter

+2.0%/yr

+2.0%/yr

+2.0%/yr

+2.0%/yr

+2.0%/yr

+2.0%/yr

+2.0%/yr

+2.0%/yr

0.83

1.39

Note:

(1)

The pricing assumptions used in the GLJ Report with respect to net present value of future net revenue (forecast) as well as the inflation rates used for operating and capital costs are set forth above.  The NGL price is an aggregate of the individual natural gas liquids prices used in the Total Proved plus Probable evaluation.  GLJ is an independent qualified reserves evaluator appointed pursuant to NI 51-101.

 

All forecast prices in the tables above are provided by GLJ.  For 2017, the price of crude oil in the United States is based on WTI. The benchmark price for Canadian crude oil is Edmonton Par and Canadian natural gas is priced against AECO.  The benchmark price for Australia, France and Germany crude oil is Dated Brent.  The price of our natural gas in Ireland is based on the NBP index.  The price of Vermilion’s natural gas in the Netherlands and Germany is based on the TTF day/month-ahead index, as determined on the Title Transfer Facility Virtual Trading Point.   For the year ended December 31, 2017, the average realized sales prices before hedging were $57.64 per bbl (United States) for WTI, $51.36 per bbl for Canadian-based crude oil, condensate and NGLs and $2.34 per Mcf for Canadian natural gas, $73.99 per bbl (Australia), $67.08 per bbl (France) for Brent-based crude oil, $7.19 per Mcf (Ireland), $7.18 per Mcf (Netherlands), and $6.38 per Mcf (Germany).

The following table summarizes the capital expenditures made by Vermilion on oil and gas properties for the year ended December 31, 2017:

Table 2: Capital Costs Incurred

Acquisition Costs

(M$)

Proved
Properties

Unproved
Properties

Exploration
Costs

Development
Costs

Total
Costs

Australia

—

—

—

29,896

29,896

Canada

22,011

—

—

148,211

170,222

Croatia

—

—

2,764

—

2,764

France

—

—

2,294

69,026

71,320

Germany

—

—

3,366

5,710

9,076

Hungary

—

—

2,596

—

2,596

Ireland

—

—

—

544

544

Netherlands

—

—

16,468

14,956

31,424

United States

3,403

—

—

19,058

22,461

Total

25,414

—

32,103

287,401

344,918

 

The following table sets forth the reserve life index based on total proved and proved plus probable reserve and fourth quarter 2017 production of 72,821 boe/d.

Table 3: Reserve Life Index

Commodity

Production

Reserve Life Index (years)

Fourth Quarter 2017

Total Proved

Proved Plus Probable

Crude oil, condensate and natural gas liquids (bbl/d)

33,109

8.5

13.8

Natural gas (mmcf/d)

238.27

5.1

9.1

Oil Equivalent (boe/d)

72,821

6.6

11.2

 

 

The following tables provide reserves data and a breakdown of future net revenue by component and production group using forecast prices and costs.  For Canada, the tables following include Alberta gas cost allowance.

The following tables may not total due to rounding.

Table 4: Oil and Gas Reserves – Based on Forecast Prices and Costs (1)

Light Crude Oil & Medium
Crude Oil

Heavy Oil

Tight Oil

Conventional Natural Gas

Gross (2)

Net (2)

Gross (2)

Net (2)

Gross (2)

Net(2)

Gross (2)

Net (2)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

Proved Developed Producing (3) (5) (6)

Australia

9,065

9,065

—

—

—

—

—

—

Canada

11,148

10,219

—

—

—

—

139,772

128,023

France

35,944

33,265

—

—

—

—

8,619

7,939

Germany

5,008

4,880

—

—

—

—

29,791

26,881

Ireland

—

—

—

—

—

—

81,803

81,803

Netherlands

—

—

—

—

—

—

37,296

24,721

United States

982

782

—

—

—

—

1,071

854

Total Proved Developed Producing

62,147

58,211

—

—

—

—

298,352

270,221

Shale Gas

Coal Bed Methane

Natural Gas Liquids

BOE

Gross (2)

Net (2)

Gross (2)

Net (2)

Gross (2)

Net(2)

Gross (2)

Net (2)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mboe)

(Mboe)

Proved Developed Producing (3) (5) (6)

Australia

—

—

—

—

—

—

9,065

9,065

Canada

60

56

2,330

2,153

11,215

9,102

46,057

41,026

France

—

—

—

—

—

—

37,381

34,588

Germany

—

—

—

—

—

—

9,973

9,360

Ireland

—

—

—

—

—

—

13,634

13,634

Netherlands

—

—

—

—

137

90

6,353

4,210

United States

—

—

—

—

147

117

1,308

1,041

Total Proved Developed Producing

60

56

2,330

2,153

11,499

9,309

123,771

112,924

Light Crude Oil & Medium
Crude Oil

Heavy Oil

Tight Oil

Conventional Natural Gas

Gross (2)

Net (2)

Gross (2)

Net (2)

Gross (2)

Net(2)

Gross (2)

Net (2)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

Proved Developed Non-Producing (3) (5) (7)

Australia

350

350

—

—

—

—

Canada

878

768

—

—

—

—

9,420

8,489

France

562

492

—

—

—

—

—

—

Germany

539

521

—

—

—

—

8,959

8,156

Ireland

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Netherlands

—

—

—

—

—

—

21,010

20,482

United States

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Total Proved Developed Non-Producing

2,329

2,131

—

—

—

—

39,389

37,127

Shale Gas

Coal Bed Methane

Natural Gas Liquids

BOE

Gross (2)

Net (2)

Gross (2)

Net (2)

Gross (2)

Net(2)

Gross (2)

Net (2)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mboe)

(Mboe)

Proved Developed Non-Producing (3) (5) (7)

Australia

—

—

—

—

—

—

350

350

Canada

1,079

1,025

2,360

2,200

410

309

3,431

3,029

France

—

—

—

—

—

—

562

492

Germany

—

—

—

—

—

—

2,032

1,880

Ireland

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Netherlands

—

—

—

—

56

54

3,558

3,468

United States

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Total Proved Developed Non-Producing

1,079

1,025

2,360

2,200

466

363

9,933

9,219

Light Crude Oil & Medium
Crude Oil

Heavy Oil

Tight Oil

Conventional Natural Gas

Gross (2)

Net (2)

Gross (2)

Net (2)

Gross (2)

Net(2)

Gross (2)

Net (2)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

Proved Undeveloped (3) (8)

Australia

1,500

1,500

—

—

—

—

—

—

Canada

7,634

6,929

—

—

—

—

91,104

83,603

France

4,140

3,767

—

—

—

—

64

64

Germany

241

235

—

—

—

—

2,361

1,939

Ireland

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Netherlands

—

—

—

—

—

—

2,620

2,620

United States

3,300

2,693

—

—

—

—

3,309

2,700

Total Proved Undeveloped

16,815

15,124

—

—

—

—

99,458

90,926

Shale Gas

Coal Bed Methane

Natural Gas Liquids

BOE

Gross (2)

Net (2)

Gross (2)

Net (2)

Gross (2)

Net(2)

Gross (2)

Net (2)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mboe)

(Mboe)

Proved Undeveloped (3) (8)

Australia

—

—

—

—

—

—

1,500

1,500

Canada

—

—

2,023

1,849

8,679

7,689

31,834

28,860

France

—

—

—

—

—

—

4,151

3,778

Germany

—

—

—

—

—

—

635

558

Ireland

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Netherlands

—

—

—

—

—

—

437

437

United States

—

—

—

—

454

370

4,306

3,513

Total Proved Undeveloped

—

—

2,023

1,849

9,133

8,059

42,863

38,646

Light Crude Oil & Medium
Crude Oil

Heavy Oil

Tight Oil

Conventional Natural Gas

Gross (2)

Net (2)

Gross (2)

Net (2)

Gross (2)

Net(2)

Gross (2)

Net (2)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

Proved (3)

Australia

10,915

10,915

—

—

—

—

—

—

Canada

19,660

17,916

—

—

—

—

240,296

220,115

France

40,646

37,524

—

—

—

—

8,683

8,003

Germany

5,788

5,636

—

—

—

—

41,111

36,976

Ireland

—

—

—

—

—

—

81,803

81,803

Netherlands

—

—

—

—

—

—

60,926

47,823

United States

4,282

3,475

—

—

—

—

4,380

3,554

Total Proved

81,291

75,466

—

—

—

—

437,199

398,274

Shale Gas

Coal Bed Methane

Natural Gas Liquids

BOE

Gross (2)

Net (2)

Gross (2)

Net (2)

Gross (2)

Net(2)

Gross (2)

Net (2)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mboe)

(Mboe)

Proved (3)

Australia

—

—

—

—

—

—

10,915

10,915

Canada

1,139

1,081

6,713

6,202

20,304

17,100

81,322

72,916

France

—

—

—

—

—

—

42,093

38,858

Germany

—

—

—

—

—

—

12,640

11,799

Ireland

—

—

—

—

—

—

13,634

13,634

Netherlands

—

—

—

—

193

144

10,347

8,115

United States

—

—

—

—

601

487

5,613

4,554

Total Proved

1,139

1,081

6,713

6,202

21,098

17,731

176,564

160,791

Light Crude Oil & Medium
Crude Oil

Heavy Oil

Tight Oil

Conventional Natural Gas

Gross (2)

Net (2)

Gross (2)

Net (2)

Gross (2)

Net(2)

Gross (2)

Net (2)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

Probable (4)

Australia

4,650

4,650

—

—

—

—

—

—

Canada

12,885

11,417

—

—

—

—

181,055

164,336

France

21,786

20,115

—

—

—

—

1,854

1,769

Germany

3,000

2,931

—

—

—

—

53,134

47,092

Ireland

—

—

—

—

—

—

51,389

51,389

Netherlands

—

—

—

—

—

—

44,380

35,383

United States

7,073

5,827

—

—

—

—

7,520

6,194

Total Probable

49,394

44,940

—

—

—

—

339,332

306,163

Shale Gas

Coal Bed Methane

Natural Gas Liquids

BOE

Gross (2)

Net (2)

Gross (2)

Net (2)

Gross (2)

Net(2)

Gross (2)

Net (2)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mboe)

(Mboe)

Probable (4)

Australia

—

—

—

—

—

—

4,650

4,650

Canada

214

203

3,053

2,846

14,282

12,186

57,887

51,501

France

—

—

—

—

—

—

22,095

20,410

Germany

—

—

—

—

—

—

11,856

10,780

Ireland

—

—

—

—

—

—

8,565

8,565

Netherlands

—

—

—

—

119

90

7,516

5,987

United States

—

—

—

—

1,031

849

9,357

7,708

Total Probable

214

203

3,053

2,846

15,432

13,125

121,926

109,601

Light Crude Oil & Medium
Crude Oil

Heavy Oil

Tight Oil

Conventional Natural Gas

Gross (2)

Net (2)

Gross (2)

Net (2)

Gross (2)

Net(2)

Gross (2)

Net (2)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

Proved Plus Probable (3) (4)

Australia

15,565

15,565

—

—

—

—

—

—

Canada

32,545

29,333

—

—

—

—

421,351

384,451

France

62,432

57,639

—

—

—

—

10,537

9,772

Germany

8,788

8,567

—

—

—

—

94,245

84,068

Ireland

—

—

—

—

—

—

133,192

133,192

Netherlands

—

—

—

—

—

—

105,306

83,206

United States

11,355

9,302

—

—

—

—

11,900

9,748

Total Proved Plus Probable

130,685

120,406

—

—

—

—

776,531

704,437

Shale Gas

Coal Bed Methane

Natural Gas Liquids

BOE

Gross (2)

Net (2)

Gross (2)

Net (2)

Gross (2)

Net(2)

Gross (2)

Net (2)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mboe)

(Mboe)

Proved Plus Probable (3) (4)

Australia

—

—

—

—

—

—

15,565

15,565

Canada

1,353

1,284

9,766

9,048

34,586

29,286

139,209

124,416

France

—

—

—

—

—

—

64,188

59,268

Germany

—

—

—

—

—

—

24,496

22,578

Ireland

—

—

—

—

—

—

22,199

22,199

Netherlands

—

—

—

—

312

234

17,863

14,102

United States

—

—

—

—

1,632

1,336

14,970

12,263

Total Proved Plus Probable

1,353

1,284

9,766

9,048

36,530

30,856

298,490

270,391

Notes:

(1)

The pricing assumptions used in the GLJ Report with respect to net present value of future net revenue (forecast) as well as the inflation rates used for operating and capital costs are set forth below.  See “Forecast Prices used in Estimates”.  The NGL price is an aggregate of the individual natural gas liquids prices used in the Total Proved plus Probable evaluation.  GLJ is an independent qualified reserves evaluator appointed pursuant to NI 51-101.

(2)

“Gross Reserves” are Vermilion’s working interest (operating or non-operating) share before deduction of royalties and without including any royalty interests of Vermilion.  “Net Reserves” are Vermilion’s working interest (operating or non-operating) share after deduction of royalty obligations, plus Vermilion’s royalty interests in reserves.

(3)

“Proved” reserves are those reserves that can be estimated with a high degree of certainty to be recoverable.  It is likely that the actual remaining quantities recovered will exceed the estimated proved reserves.

(4)

“Probable” reserves are those additional reserves that are less certain to be recovered than proved reserves.  It is equally likely that the actual remaining quantities recovered will be greater or less than the sum of the estimated proved plus probable reserves.

(5)

“Developed” reserves are those reserves that are expected to be recovered from existing wells and installed facilities or, if facilities have not been installed, that would involve a low expenditure (e.g. when compared to the cost of drilling a well) to put the reserves on production.

(6)

“Developed Producing” reserves are those reserves that are expected to be recovered from completion intervals open at the time of the estimate.  These reserves may be currently producing or, if shut-in, they must have previously been on production, and the date of resumption of production must be known with reasonable certainty.

(7)

“Developed Non-Producing” reserves are those reserves that either have not been on production, or have previously been on production, but are shut in, and the date of resumption of production is unknown.

(8)

“Undeveloped” reserves are those reserves expected to be recovered from known accumulations where a significant expenditure (for example, when compared to the cost of drilling a well) is required to render them capable of production.  They must fully meet the requirements of the reserves classification (proved, probable, possible) to which they are assigned.

 

Table 5: Net Present Values of Future Net Revenue – Based on Forecast Prices and Costs (1)

Before Deducting Future Income Taxes Discounted At

After Deducting Future Income Taxes Discounted At

(M$)

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

Proved Developed Producing (2) (4) (5)

Australia

(17,017)

90,880

132,474

146,048

147,713

77,180

124,390

136,979

136,121

130,383

Canada

929,867

770,860

647,843

559,708

494,964

929,867

770,860

647,843

559,708

494,964

France

1,791,774

1,315,070

1,030,403

849,032

725,407

1,473,144

1,091,894

858,839

708,168

604,390

Germany

276,577

249,619

206,965

174,876

151,703

276,578

249,619

206,965

174,876

151,703

Ireland

389,204

376,115

346,327

316,408

290,143

389,204

376,115

346,327

316,408

290,143

Netherlands

48,794

60,781

66,245

68,260

68,404

48,793

60,781

66,245

68,260

68,404

United States

44,617

34,550

28,272

24,106

21,170

44,619

34,550

28,272

24,106

21,170

Total Proved Developed Producing

3,463,816

2,897,875

2,458,529

2,138,438

1,899,504

3,239,385

2,708,209

2,291,470

1,987,647

1,761,157

Proved Developed Non-Producing (2) (4) (6)

Australia

28,079

24,122

20,869

18,180

15,942

28,079

24,122

20,869

18,180

15,942

Canada

60,804

42,405

32,416

26,238

22,048

60,804

42,405

32,417

26,238

22,048

France

10,082

8,113

6,095

4,559

3,438

6,848

5,499

3,953

2,763

1,896

Germany

49,825

37,600

27,510

20,411

15,501

32,059

29,369

23,502

18,374

14,426

Ireland

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Netherlands

70,140

70,244

67,599

63,916

59,989

53,099

54,167

52,375

49,452

46,205

United States

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Total Proved Developed Non-Producing

218,930

182,484

154,489

133,304

116,918

180,889

155,562

133,116

115,007

100,517

Proved Undeveloped (2) (7)

Australia

54,981

43,263

34,175

27,105

21,564

25,101

18,532

13,890

10,524

8,032

Canada

524,830

354,396

246,584

175,252

126,009

397,236

281,016

202,741

148,193

108,836

France

177,851

128,923

96,156

73,638

57,592

127,650

88,876

63,091

45,660

33,460

Germany

17,161

11,696

8,012

5,495

3,737

12,154

8,910

6,412

4,551

3,166

Ireland

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Netherlands

10,559

8,825

7,405

6,255

5,323

7,921

6,405

5,174

4,189

3,401

United States

110,911

64,500

39,231

24,394

15,111

105,425

62,306

38,295

23,973

14,912

Total Proved Undeveloped

896,293

611,603

431,563

312,139

229,336

675,487

466,045

329,603

237,090

171,807

Proved (2)

Australia

66,043

158,265

187,518

191,333

185,219

130,360

167,044

171,738

164,825

154,357

Canada

1,515,501

1,167,661

926,843

761,198

643,021

1,387,907

1,094,281

883,001

734,139

625,848

France

1,979,707

1,452,106

1,132,654

927,229

786,437

1,607,642

1,186,269

925,883

756,591

639,746

Germany

343,563

298,915

242,487

200,782

170,941

320,791

287,898

236,879

197,801

169,295

Ireland

389,204

376,115

346,327

316,408

290,143

389,204

376,115

346,327

316,408

290,143

Netherlands

129,493

139,850

141,249

138,431

133,716

109,813

121,353

123,794

121,901

118,010

United States

155,528

99,050

67,503

48,500

36,281

150,044

96,856

66,567

48,079

36,082

Total Proved

4,579,039

3,691,962

3,044,581

2,583,881

2,245,758

4,095,761

3,329,816

2,754,189

2,339,744

2,033,481

Probable (3)

Australia

154,459

149,732

125,619

102,719

84,652

93,591

88,478

72,912

58,670

47,633

Canada

1,363,584

814,347

539,091

384,014

288,722

1,003,602

592,655

390,429

278,355

210,521

France

1,200,008

673,205

431,159

299,927

219,972

879,913

477,377

292,831

193,985

134,663

Germany

414,585

244,149

151,416

100,767

70,641

293,314

172,157

104,603

68,306

47,063

Ireland

350,695

246,321

182,785

141,844

114,117

350,695

246,321

182,785

141,844

114,117

Netherlands

197,136

167,242

141,871

121,179

104,496

130,277

108,388

89,527

74,196

61,980

United States

353,649

198,078

124,603

84,897

61,103

278,493

157,846

100,547

69,404

50,591

Total Probable

4,034,116

2,493,074

1,696,544

1,235,347

943,703

3,029,885

1,843,222

1,233,634

884,760

666,568

Proved Plus Probable (2) (3)

Australia

220,502

307,997

313,137

294,052

269,871

223,951

255,522

244,650

223,495

201,990

Canada

2,879,085

1,982,008

1,465,934

1,145,212

931,743

2,391,509

1,686,936

1,273,430

1,012,494

836,369

France

3,179,715

2,125,311

1,563,813

1,227,156

1,006,409

2,487,555

1,663,646

1,218,714

950,576

774,409

Germany

758,148

543,064

393,903

301,549

241,582

614,105

460,055

341,482

266,107

216,358

Ireland

739,899

622,436

529,112

458,252

404,260

739,899

622,436

529,112

458,252

404,260

Netherlands

326,629

307,092

283,120

259,610

238,212

240,090

229,741

213,321

196,097

179,990

United States

509,177

297,128

192,106

133,397

97,384

428,537

254,702

167,114

117,483

86,673

Total Proved Plus Probable

8,613,155

6,185,036

4,741,125

3,819,228

3,189,461

7,125,646

5,173,038

3,987,823

3,224,504

2,700,049

Notes:

(1)    

The pricing assumptions used in the GLJ Report with respect to net present value of future net revenue (forecast) as well as the inflation rates used for operating and capital costs are set forth below.  See “Forecast Prices used in Estimates”. The NGL price is an aggregate of the individual natural gas liquids prices used in the Total Proved plus Probable evaluation. GLJ is an independent qualified reserves evaluator appointed pursuant to NI 51-101.

(2)

“Proved” reserves are those reserves that can be estimated with a high degree of certainty to be recoverable.  It is likely that the actual remaining quantities recovered will exceed the estimated proved reserves.

(3)

“Probable” reserves are those additional reserves that are less certain to be recovered than proved reserves.  It is equally likely that the actual remaining quantities recovered will be greater or less than the sum of the estimated proved plus probable reserves.

(4)

“Developed” reserves are those reserves that are expected to be recovered from existing wells and installed facilities or, if facilities have not been installed, that would involve a low expenditure (e.g. when compared to the cost of drilling a well) to put the reserves on production.

(5)

“Developed Producing” reserves are those reserves that are expected to be recovered from completion intervals open at the time of the estimate.  These reserves may be currently producing or, if shut-in, they must have previously been on production, and the date of resumption of production must be known with reasonable certainty.

(6)

“Developed Non-Producing” reserves are those reserves that either have not been on production, or have previously been on production, but are shut in, and the date of resumption of production is unknown.

(7)

“Undeveloped” reserves are those reserves expected to be recovered from known accumulations where a significant expenditure (for example, when compared to the cost of drilling a well) is required to render them capable of production.  They must fully meet the requirements of the reserves classification (proved, probable, possible) to which they are assigned.

 

Table 6: Total Future Net Revenue (Undiscounted) Based on Forecast Prices and Costs (1)

(M$)

Revenue

Royalties

Operating
Costs

Capital
Development
Costs

Abandonment
and
Reclamation
Costs

Future Net
Revenue
Before
Income Taxes

Future
Income Taxes

Future Net
Revenue
After
Income Taxes

Proved (2)

Australia

978,200

—

564,074

100,883

247,200

66,043

(64,317)

130,360

Canada

3,488,501

344,924

1,118,811

412,323

96,942

1,515,501

127,594

1,387,907

France

3,591,175

272,788

997,961

125,874

214,845

1,979,707

372,065

1,607,642

Germany

853,470

44,503

298,194

20,409

146,801

343,563

22,772

320,791

Ireland

643,435

—

170,325

18,907

64,999

389,204

—

389,204

Netherlands

546,125

104,158

203,425

28,166

80,883

129,493

19,680

109,813

United States

404,551

112,559

65,468

66,993

4,003

155,528

5,484

150,044

Total Proved

10,505,457

878,932

3,418,258

773,555

855,673

4,579,039

483,278

4,095,761

Proved Plus Probable (2) (3)

Australia

1,432,958

—

775,932

166,801

269,723

220,502

(3,449)

223,951

Canada

6,224,592

647,349

1,828,575

744,672

124,911

2,879,085

487,576

2,391,509

France

5,718,238

433,546

1,481,349

346,196

277,432

3,179,715

692,160

2,487,555

Germany

1,672,382

105,662

507,204

104,899

196,469

758,148

144,043

614,105

Ireland

1,113,630

—

270,554

38,178

64,999

739,899

—

739,899

Netherlands

950,074

180,041

296,854

53,369

93,181

326,629

86,539

240,090

United States

1,137,518

308,001

166,074

145,966

8,300

509,177

80,640

428,537

Total Proved Plus Probable

18,249,392

1,674,599

5,326,542

1,600,081

1,035,015

8,613,155

1,487,509

7,125,646

Notes:

(1)

The pricing assumptions used in the GLJ Report with respect to net present value of future net revenue (forecast) as well as the inflation rates used for operating and capital costs are set forth below.  See “Forecast Prices used in Estimates”. The NGL price is an aggregate of the individual natural gas liquids prices used in the Total Proved plus Probable evaluation. GLJ is an independent qualified reserves evaluator appointed pursuant to NI 51-101.

(2)

“Proved” reserves are those reserves that can be estimated with a high degree of certainty to be recoverable.  It is likely that the actual remaining quantities recovered will exceed the estimated proved reserves.

(3)

“Probable” reserves are those additional reserves that are less certain to be recovered than proved reserves.  It is equally likely that the actual remaining quantities recovered will be greater or less than the sum of the estimated proved plus probable reserves.

 

Table 7: Future Net Revenue by Production Group Based on Forecast Prices and Costs (1)

Future Net Revenue
Before Income Taxes (2)
(Discounted at 10% Per Year)

Unit Value

Proved Developed Producing

(M$)

($/boe)

Light Crude Oil & Medium Crude Oil (3)

1,764,235

27.51

Heavy Oil (3)

—

—

Conventional Natural Gas (4)

693,722

14.33

Shale Gas

122

8.56

Coal Bed Methane

450

1.25

Total Proved Developed Producing

2,458,529

21.77

Proved Developed Non-Producing

Light Crude Oil & Medium Crude Oil (3)

43,821

18.44

Heavy Oil (3)

—

—

Conventional Natural Gas (4)

108,904

17.4

Shale Gas

984

4.54

Coal Bed Methane

780

2.13

Total Proved Developed Non-Producing

154,489

16.76

Proved Undeveloped

Light Crude Oil & Medium Crude Oil (3)

273,008

14.16

Heavy Oil (3)

—

—

Conventional Natural Gas (4)

158,318

8.31

Shale Gas

—

—

Coal Bed Methane

237

0.77

Total Proved Undeveloped

431,563

12.04

Proved

Light Crude Oil & Medium Crude Oil (3)

2,081,064

24.35

Heavy Oil (3)

—

—

Conventional Natural Gas (4)

960,944

12.92

Shale Gas

1,106

4.58

Coal Bed Methane

1,467

1.36

Total Proved

3,044,581

18.94

Probable

Light Crude Oil & Medium Crude Oil (3)

1,031,625

19.21

Heavy Oil (3)

—

—

Conventional Natural Gas (4)

663,113

11.98

Shale Gas

238

5.49

Coal Bed Methane

1,568

3.31

Total Probable

1,696,544

15.48

Proved Plus Probable

Light Crude Oil & Medium Crude Oil (3)

3,112,689

22.47

Heavy Oil (3)

—

—

Conventional Natural Gas (4)

1,624,057

12.42

Shale Gas

1,344

4.85

Coal Bed Methane

3,035

1.92

Total Proved Plus Probable

4,741,125

17.53

Notes:

(1) 

The pricing assumptions used in the GLJ Report with respect to net present value of future net revenue (forecast) as well as the inflation rates used for operating and capital costs are set forth below.  See “Forecast Prices used in Estimates”. The NGL price is an aggregate of the individual natural gas liquids prices used in the Total Proved plus Probable evaluation. GLJ is an independent qualified reserves evaluator appointed pursuant to NI 51-101.

(2)

Other Company revenue and costs not related to a specific product type have been allocated proportionately to the specified product types.  Unit values are based on Company net reserves.  Net present value of reserves categories are an approximation based on major products.

(3)

Including solution gas and other by-products.

(4)  

Including by-products but excluding solution gas.

Reconciliations of Changes in Reserves

The following tables set forth a reconciliation of the changes in Vermilion’s gross light and medium crude oil, heavy oil and associated and non-associated gas (combined) reserves as at December 31, 2017 compared to such reserves as at December 31, 2016.

Table 8: Reconciliation of Company Gross Reserves by Principal Product Type – Based on Forecast Prices and Costs (3)

AUSTRALIA

Total Oil (4)

Light Crude Oil &
Medium Crude Oil

Heavy Oil

Tight Oil

Proved Probable P+P(1) (2)

Proved

Probable

Proved +
Probable

Proved

Probable

Proved +
Probable

Proved

Probable

Proved +
Probable

Proved

Probable

Proved +
Probable

Factors

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

At December 31, 2016

12,418

4,650

17,068

12,418

4,650

17,068

—

—

—

—

—

—

Discoveries

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Extensions & Improved Recovery

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Technical Revisions

603

—

603

603

—

603

—

—

—

—

—

—

Acquisitions

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Dispositions

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Economic Factors

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Production

(2,106)

—

(2,106)

(2,106)

—

(2,106)

—

—

—

—

—

—

At December 31, 2017

10,915

4,650

15,565

10,915

4,650

15,565

—

—

—

—

—

—

Total Gas (4)

Conventional Natural Gas

Coal Bed Methane (5)

Shale Gas (5)

Proved

Probable

Proved +
Probable

Proved

Probable

Proved +
Probable

Proved

Probable

Proved +
Probable

Proved

Probable

Proved +
Probable

Factors

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

At December 31, 2016

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Discoveries

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Extensions & Improved Recovery

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Technical Revisions

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Acquisitions

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Dispositions

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Economic Factors

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Production

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

At December 31, 2017

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Natural Gas Liquids

BOE

Proved

Probable

Proved +
Probable

Proved

Probable

Proved +
Probable

Factors

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mboe)

(Mboe)

(Mboe)

At December 31, 2016

—

—

—

12,418

4,650

17,068

Discoveries

—

—

—

—

—

—

Extensions & Improved Recovery

—

—

—

—

—

—

Technical Revisions

—

—

—

603

—

603

Acquisitions

—

—

—

—

—

—

Dispositions

—

—

—

—

—

—

Economic Factors

—

—

—

—

—

—

Production

—

—

—

(2,106)

—

(2,106)

At December 31, 2017

—

—

—

10,915

4,650

15,565

 

CANADA

Total Oil (4)

Light Crude Oil &
Medium Crude Oil

Heavy Oil

Tight Oil

Proved Probable P+P (1) (2)

Proved

Probable

Proved +
Probable

Proved

Probable

Proved +
Probable

Proved

Probable

Proved +
Probable

Proved

Probable

Proved +
Probable

Factors

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

At December 31, 2016

21,974

14,105

36,079

21,962

14,103

36,065

—

—

—

12

2

14

Discoveries

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Extensions & Improved Recovery

594

302

896

594

302

896

—

—

—

—

—

—

Technical Revisions

(681)

(1,542)

(2,223)

(670)

(1,540)

(2,210)

—

—

—

(11)

(2)

(13)

Acquisitions

16

4

20

16

4

20

—

—

—

—

—

—

Dispositions

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Economic Factors

(48)

16

(32)

(48)

16

(32)

—

—

—

—

—

—

Production

(2,195)

—

(2,195)

(2,194)

—

(2,194)

—

—

—

(1)

—

(1)

At December 31, 2017

19,660

12,885

32,545

19,660

12,885

32,545

—

—

—

—

—

—

Total Gas (4)

Conventional Natural Gas

Coal Bed Methane (5)

Shale Gas (5)

Proved

Probable

Proved +
Probable

Proved

Probable

Proved +
Probable

Proved

Probable

Proved +
Probable

Proved

Probable

Proved +
Probable

Factors

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

At December 31, 2016

226,530

156,668

383,198

217,098

151,707

368,805

8,061

4,677

12,738

1,371

284

1,655

Discoveries

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Extensions & Improved Recovery

58,040

29,520

87,560

57,075

28,977

86,052

965

543

1,508

—

—

—

Technical Revisions

1,696

372

2,068

1,057

378

1,435

799

64

863

(160)

(70)

(230)

Acquisitions

3,452

1,113

4,565

2,686

872

3,558

766

241

1,007

—

—

—

Dispositions

(2,182)

(2,150)

(4,332)

(576)

(231)

(807)

(1,606)

(1,919)

(3,525)

—

—

—

Economic Factors

(3,658)

(1,201)

(4,859)

(2,497)

(648)

(3,145)

(1,161)

(553)

(1,714)

—

—

—

Production

(35,730)

—

(35,730)

(34,547)

—

(34,547)

(1,111)

—

(1,111)

(72)

—

(72)

At December 31, 2017

248,148

184,322

432,470

240,296

181,055

421,351

6,713

3,053

9,766

1,139

214

1,353

Natural Gas Liquids

BOE

Proved

Probable

Proved +
Probable

Proved

Probable

Proved +
Probable

Factors

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mboe)

(Mboe)

(Mboe)

At December 31, 2016

17,363

12,907

30,270

77,092

53,123

130,215

Discoveries

—

—

—

—

—

—

Extensions & Improved Recovery

5,669

1,235

6,904

15,936

6,457

22,393

Technical Revisions

(271)

95

(176)

(668)

(1,386)

(2,054)

Acquisitions

351

113

464

942

303

1,245

Dispositions

(3)

(1)

(4)

(367)

(359)

(726)

Economic Factors

(184)

(67)

(251)

(842)

(251)

(1,093)

Production

(2,621)

—

(2,621)

(10,771)

—

(10,771)

At December 31, 2017

20,304

14,282

34,586

81,322

57,887

139,209

 

FRANCE

Total Oil (4)

Light Crude Oil &
Medium Crude Oil

Heavy Oil

Tight Oil

Proved Probable P+P (1) (2)

Proved

Probable

Proved +
Probable

Proved

Probable

Proved +
Probable

Proved

Probable

Proved +
Probable

Proved

Probable

Proved +
Probable

Factors

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

At December 31, 2016

42,044

21,933

63,977

42,044

21,933

63,977

—

—

—

—

—

—

Discoveries

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Extensions & Improved Recovery

1,688

1,879

3,567

1,688

1,879

3,567

—

—

—

—

—

—

Technical Revisions

1,086

(1,912)

(826)

1,086

(1,912)

(826)

—

—

—

—

—

—

Acquisitions

 

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Dispositions

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Economic Factors

(126)

(114)

(240)

(126)

(114)

(240)

—

—

—

—

—

—

Production

(4,046)

—

(4,046)

(4,046)

—

(4,046)

—

—

—

—

—

—

At December 31, 2017

40,646

21,786

62,432

40,646

21,786

62,432

—

—

—

—

—

—

Total Gas (4)

Conventional Natural Gas

Coal Bed Methane (5)

Shale Gas (5)

Proved

Probable

Proved +
Probable

Proved

Probable

Proved +
Probable

Proved

Probable

Proved +
Probable

Proved

Probable

Proved +
Probable

Factors

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

At December 31, 2016

5,482

892

6,374

5,482

892

6,374

—

—

—

—

—

—

Discoveries

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Extensions & Improved Recovery

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Technical Revisions

3,239

968

4,207

3,239

968

4,207

—

—

—

—

—

—

Acquisitions

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Dispositions

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Economic Factors

(37)

(6)

(43)

(37)

(6)

(43)

—

—

—

—

—

—

Production

(1)

—

(1)

(1)

—

(1)

—

—

—

—

—

—

At December 31, 2017

8,683

1,854

10,537

8,683

1,854

10,537

—

—

—

—

—

—

Natural Gas Liquids

BOE

Proved

Probable

Proved +
Probable

Proved

Probable

Proved +
Probable

Factors

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mboe)

(Mboe)

(Mboe)

At December 31, 2016

—

—

—

42,958

22,082

65,040

Discoveries

—

—

—

—

—

—

Extensions & Improved Recovery

—

—

—

1,688

1,879

3,567

Technical Revisions

—

—

—

1,625

(1,751)

(126)

Acquisitions

—

—

—

—

—

—

Dispositions

—

—

—

—

—

—

Economic Factors

—

—

—

(132)

(115)

(247)

Production

—

—

—

(4,046)

—

(4,046)

At December 31, 2017

—

—

—

42,093

22,095

64,188

 

GERMANY

Total Oil (4)

Light Crude Oil &
Medium Crude Oil

Heavy Oil

Tight Oil

Proved Probable P+P (1) (2)

Proved

Probable

Proved +
Probable

Proved

Probable

Proved +
Probable

Proved

Probable

Proved +
Probable

Proved

Probable

Proved +
Probable

Factors

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

At December 31, 2016

5,288

2,279

7,567

5,288

2,279

7,567

—

—

—

—

—

—

Discoveries

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Extensions & Improved Recovery

300

275

575

300

275

575

—

—

—

—

—

—

Technical Revisions

699

480

1,179

699

480

1,179

—

—

—

—

—

—

Acquisitions

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Dispositions

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Economic Factors

(112)

(34)

(146)

(112)

(34)

(146)

—

—

—

—

—

—

Production

(387)

—

(387)

(387)

—

(387)

—

—

—

—

—

—

At December 31, 2017

5,788

3,000

8,788

5,788

3,000

8,788

—

—

—

—

—

—

Total Gas (4)

Conventional Natural Gas

Coal Bed Methane (5)

Shale Gas (5)

Proved

Probable

Proved +
Probable

Proved

Probable

Proved +
Probable

Proved

Probable

Proved +
Probable

Proved

Probable

Proved +
Probable

Factors

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

At December 31, 2016

41,481

54,284

95,765

41,481

54,284

95,765

—

—

—

—

—

—

Discoveries

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Extensions & Improved Recovery

117

108

225

117

108

225

—

—

—

—

—

—

Technical Revisions

6,590

(1,027)

5,563

6,590

(1,027)

5,563

—

—

—

—

—

—

Acquisitions

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Dispositions

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Economic Factors

—

(231)

(231)

—

(231)

(231)

—

—

—

—

—

—

Production

(7,077)

—

(7,077)

(7,077)

—

(7,077)

—

—

—

—

—

—

At December 31, 2017

41,111

53,134

94,245

41,111

53,134

94,245

—

—

—

—

—

—

Natural Gas Liquids

BOE

Proved

Probable

Proved +
Probable

Proved

Probable

Proved +
Probable

Factors

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mboe)

(Mboe)

(Mboe)

At December 31, 2016

—

—

—

12,202

11,326

23,528

Discoveries

—

—

—

—

—

—

Extensions & Improved Recovery

—

—

—

320

293

613

Technical Revisions

—

—

—

1,797

310

2,107

Acquisitions

—

—

—

—

—

—

Dispositions

—

—

—

—

—

—

Economic Factors

—

—

—

(112)

(73)

(185)

Production

—

—

—

(1,567)

—

(1,567)

At December 31, 2017

—

—

—

12,640

11,856

24,496

 

IRELAND

Total Oil (4)

Light Crude Oil &
Medium Crude Oil

Heavy Oil

Tight Oil

Proved Probable P+P (1) (2)

Proved

Probable

Proved +
Probable

Proved

Probable

Proved +
Probable

Proved

Probable

Proved +
Probable

Proved

Probable

Proved +
Probable

Factors

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

At December 31, 2016

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Discoveries

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Extensions & Improved Recovery

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Technical Revisions

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Acquisitions

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Dispositions

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Economic Factors

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Production

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

At December 31, 2017

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Total Gas (4)

Conventional Natural Gas

Coal Bed Methane (5)

Shale Gas (5)

Proved

Probable

Proved +
Probable

Proved

Probable

Proved +
Probable

Proved

Probable

Proved +
Probable

Proved

Probable

Proved +
Probable

Factors

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

At December 31, 2016

99,575

50,787

150,362

99,575

50,787

150,362

—

—

—

—

—

—

Discoveries

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Extensions & Improved Recovery

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Technical Revisions

3,553

602

4,155

3,553

602

4,155

—

—

—

—

—

—

Acquisitions

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Dispositions

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Economic Factors

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Production

(21,325)

—

(21,325)

(21,325)

—

(21,325)

—

—

—

—

—

—

At December 31, 2017

81,803

51,389

133,192

81,803

51,389

133,192

—

—

—

—

—

—

Natural Gas Liquids

BOE

Proved

Probable

Proved +
Probable

Proved

Probable

Proved +
Probable

Factors

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mboe)

(Mboe)

(Mboe)

At December 31, 2016

—

—

—

16,596

8,465

25,061

Discoveries

—

—

—

—

—

—

Extensions & Improved Recovery

—

—

—

—

—

—

Technical Revisions

—

—

—

592

100

692

Acquisitions

—

—

—

—

—

—

Dispositions

—

—

—

—

—

—

Economic Factors

—

—

—

—

—

—

Production

—

—

—

(3,554)

—

(3,554)

At December 31, 2017

—

—

—

13,634

8,565

22,199

 

NETHERLANDS

Total Oil (4)

Light Crude Oil &
Medium Crude Oil

Heavy Oil

Tight Oil

Proved Probable P+P (1) (2)

Proved

Probable

Proved +
Probable

Proved

Probable

Proved +
Probable

Proved

Probable

Proved +
Probable

Proved

Probable

Proved +
Probable

Factors

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

At December 31, 2016

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Discoveries

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Extensions & Improved Recovery

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Technical Revisions

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Acquisitions

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Dispositions

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Economic Factors

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Production

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

At December 31, 2017

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Total Gas (4)

Conventional Natural Gas

Coal Bed Methane (5)

Shale Gas (5)

Proved

Probable

Proved +
Probable

Proved

Probable

Proved +
Probable

Proved

Probable

Proved +
Probable

Proved

Probable

Proved +
Probable

Factors

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

At December 31, 2016

62,350

43,184

105,534

62,350

43,184

105,534

—

—

—

—

—

—

Discoveries

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Extensions & Improved Recovery

8,163

7,807

15,970

8,163

7,807

15,970

—

—

—

—

—

—

Technical Revisions

5,232

(6,579)

(1,347)

5,232

(6,579)

(1,347)

—

—

—

—

—

—

Acquisitions

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Dispositions

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Economic Factors

(22)

(32)

(54)

(22)

(32)

(54)

—

—

—

—

—

—

Production

(14,797)

—

(14,797)

(14,797)

—

(14,797)

—

—

—

—

—

—

At December 31, 2017

60,926

44,380

105,306

60,926

44,380

105,306

—

—

—

—

—

—

Natural Gas Liquids

BOE

Proved

Probable

Proved +
Probable

Proved

Probable

Proved +
Probable

Factors

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mboe)

(Mboe)

(Mboe)

At December 31, 2016

81

63

144

10,473

7,260

17,733

Discoveries

—

—

—

—

—

—

Extensions & Improved Recovery

30

21

51

1,391

1,322

2,713

Technical Revisions

115

35

150

986

(1,061)

(75)

Acquisitions

—

—

—

—

—

—

Dispositions

—

—

—

—

—

—

Economic Factors

—

—

—

(4)

(5)

(9)

Production

(33)

—

(33)

(2,499)

—

(2,499)

At December 31, 2017

193

119

312

10,347

7,516

17,863

 

UNITED STATES

Total Oil (4)

Light Crude Oil &
Medium Crude Oil

Heavy Oil

Tight Oil

Proved Probable P+P (1) (2)

Proved

Probable

Proved +
Probable

Proved

Probable

Proved +
Probable

Proved

Probable

Proved +
Probable

Proved

Probable

Proved +
Probable

Factors

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

At December 31, 2016

3,169

5,727

8,896

3,169

5,727

8,896

—

—

—

—

—

—

Discoveries

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Extensions & Improved Recovery

1,413

1,483

2,896

1,413

1,483

2,896

—

—

—

—

—

—

Technical Revisions

(49)

(133)

(182)

(49)

(133)

(182)

—

—

—

—

—

—

Acquisitions

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Dispositions

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Economic Factors

(9)

(4)

(13)

(9)

(4)

(13)

—

—

—

—

—

—

Production

(242)

—

(242)

(242)

—

(242)

—

—

—

—

—

—

At December 31, 2017

4,282

7,073

11,355

4,282

7,073

11,355

—

—

—

—

—

—

Total Gas (4)

Conventional Natural Gas

Coal Bed Methane (5)

Shale Gas (5)

Proved

Probable

Proved +
Probable

Proved

Probable

Proved +
Probable

Proved

Probable

Proved +
Probable

Proved

Probable

Proved +
Probable

Factors

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

At December 31, 2016

2,969

5,481

8,450

2,969

5,481

8,450

—

—

—

—

—

—

Discoveries

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Extensions & Improved Recovery

1,328

1,554

2,882

1,328

1,554

2,882

—

—

—

—

—

—

Technical Revisions

231

489

720

231

489

720

—

—

—

—

—

—

Acquisitions

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Dispositions

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Economic Factors

(5)

(4)

(9)

(5)

(4)

(9)

—

—

—

—

—

—

Production

(143)

—

(143)

(143)

—

(143)

—

—

—

—

—

—

At December 31, 2017

4,380

7,520

11,900

4,380

7,520

11,900

—

—

—

—

—

—

Natural Gas Liquids

BOE

Proved

Probable

Proved +
Probable

Proved

Probable

Proved +
Probable

Factors

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mboe)

(Mboe)

(Mboe)

At December 31, 2016

412

760

1,172

4,076

7,401

11,477

Discoveries

—

—

—

—

—

—

Extensions & Improved Recovery

182

213

395

1,816

1,955

3,771

Technical Revisions

28

59

87

18

7

25

Acquisitions

—

—

—

—

—

—

Dispositions

—

—

—

—

—

—

Economic Factors

(1)

(1)

(2)

(11)

(6)

(17)

Production

(20)

—

(20)

(286)

—

(286)

At December 31, 2017

601

1,031

1,632

5,613

9,357

14,970

 

TOTAL COMPANY

Total Oil (4)

Light Crude Oil &
Medium Crude Oil

Heavy Oil

Tight Oil

Proved Probable P+P (1) (2)

Proved

Probable

Proved +
Probable

Proved

Probable

Proved +
Probable

Proved

Probable

Proved +
Probable

Proved

Probable

Proved +
Probable

Factors

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

At December 31, 2016

84,893

48,694

133,587

84,881

48,692

133,573

—

—

—

12

2

14

Discoveries

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Extensions & Improved Recovery

3,995

3,939

7,934

3,995

3,939

7,934

—

—

—

—

—

—

Technical Revisions

1,658

(3,107)

(1,449)

1,669

(3,105)

(1,436)

—

—

—

(11)

(2)

(13)

Acquisitions

16

4

20

16

4

20

—

—

—

—

—

—

Dispositions

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Economic Factors

(295)

(136)

(431)

(295)

(136)

(431)

—

—

—

—

—

—

Production

(8,976)

—

(8,976)

(8,975)

—

(8,975)

—

—

—

(1)

—

(1)

At December 31, 2017

81,291

49,394

130,685

81,291

49,394

130,685

—

—

—

—

—

—

Total Gas (4)

Conventional Natural Gas

Coal Bed Methane (5)

Shale Gas (5)

Proved

Probable

Proved +
Probable

Proved

Probable

Proved +
Probable

Proved

Probable

Proved +
Probable

Proved

Probable

Proved +
Probable

Factors

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

At December 31, 2016

438,387

311,296

749,683

428,955

306,335

735,290

8,061

4,677

12,738

1,371

284

1,655

Discoveries

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Extensions & Improved Recovery

67,648

38,989

106,637

66,683

38,446

105,129

965

543

1,508

—

—

—

Technical Revisions

20,541

(5,175)

15,366

19,902

(5,169)

14,733

799

64

863

(160)

(70)

(230)

Acquisitions

3,452

1,113

4,565

2,686

872

3,558

766

241

1,007

—

—

—

Dispositions

(2,182)

(2,150)

(4,332)

(576)

(231)

(807)

(1,606)

(1,919)

(3,525)

—

—

—

Economic Factors

(3,722)

(1,474)

(5,196)

(2,561)

(921)

(3,482)

(1,161)

(553)

(1,714)

—

—

—

Production

(79,073)

—

(79,073)

(77,890)

—

(77,890)

(1,111)

—

(1,111)

(72)

—

(72)

At December 31, 2017

445,051

342,599

787,650

437,199

339,332

776,531

6,713

3,053

9,766

1,139

214

1,353

Natural Gas Liquids

BOE

Proved

Probable

Proved +
Probable

Proved

Probable

Proved +
Probable

Factors

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mboe)

(Mboe)

(Mboe)

At December 31, 2016

17,856

13,730

31,586

175,815

114,307

290,122

Discoveries

—

—

—

—

—

—

Extensions & Improved Recovery

5,881

1,469

7,350

21,151

11,906

33,057

Technical Revisions

(128)

189

61.49

4,953

(3,781)

1,172

Acquisitions

351

113

464

942

303

1,245

Dispositions

(3)

(1)

(4)

(367)

(359)

(726)

Economic Factors

(185)

(68)

(253)

(1,101)

(450)

(1,551)

Production

(2,674)

—

(2,674)

(24,829)

—

(24,829)

At December 31, 2017

21,098

15,432

36,530.49

176,564

121,926

298,490

Notes:

(1)

“Proved” reserves are those reserves that can be estimated with a high degree of certainty to be recoverable.  It is likely that the actual remaining quantities recovered will exceed the estimated proved reserves.

(2)

“Probable” reserves are those additional reserves that are less certain to be recovered than proved reserves.  It is equally likely that the actual remaining quantities recovered will be greater or less than the sum of the estimated proved plus probable reserves.

(3)

The pricing assumptions used in the GLJ Report with respect to net present value of future net revenue (forecast) as well as the inflation rates used for operating and capital costs are set forth above.  See “Forecast Prices used in Estimates”.  The NGL price is an aggregate of the individual natural gas liquids prices used in the Total Proved plus Probable evaluation. GLJ is an independent qualified reserves evaluator appointed pursuant to NI 51-101.

(4)

For reporting purposes, “Total Oil” is the sum of Light Crude oil and Medium Crude Oil, Heavy Oil and Tight Oil.  For reporting purposes, “Total Gas” is the sum of Conventional Natural Gas, Coal Bed Methane and Shale Gas.

(5)

“Coal Bed Methane” and “Shale Gas” were considered “Unconventional Natural Gas” in previous years. NI 51-101 no longer differentiates between conventional and unconventional activities.

 

The table below sets out the future development costs deducted in the estimation of future net revenue attributable to total proved reserves and total proved plus probable reserves (using forecast prices and costs).

Table 9: Future Development Costs(1)

(M$)

Total Proved
Estimated Using Forecast Prices and Costs

Total Proved Plus Probable
Estimated Using Forecast Prices and Costs

Australia

2018

11,565

11,565

2019

70,052

70,052

2020

3,026

3,026

2021

3,140

58,821

2022

3,164

3,164

Remainder

9,936

20,173

Total for all years undiscounted

100,883

166,801

Canada

2018

136,499

150,107

2019

142,540

155,186

2020

110,461

139,784

2021

20,828

119,929

2022

622

114,329

Remainder

1,373

65,337

Total for all years undiscounted

412,323

744,672

France

2018

30,969

52,162

2019

34,118

84,258

2020

19,848

100,335

2021

26,017

59,875

2022

4,289

24,707

Remainder

10,633

24,859

Total for all years undiscounted

125,874

346,196

Germany

2018

2,116

5,381

2019

11,172

17,742

2020

3,162

10,590

2021

3,185

29,808

2022

124

38,918

Remainder

650

2,460

Total for all years undiscounted

20,409

104,899

Ireland

2018

—

—

2019

1,855

1,855

2020

—

19,271

2021

—

—

2022

—

—

Remainder

17,052

17,052

Total for all years undiscounted

18,907

38,178

Netherlands

2018

3,205

9,569

2019

12,253

13,923

2020

6,181

14,170

2021

324

4,909

2022

326

4,921

Remainder

5,877

5,877

Total for all years undiscounted

28,166

53,369

United States

2018

3,797

11,392

2019

28,082

39,224

2020

35,114

46,818

2021

—

48,532

2022

—

—

Remainder

—

—

Total for all years undiscounted

66,993

145,966

Total Company

2018

188,151

240,176

2019

300,072

382,240

2020

177,792

333,994

2021

53,494

321,874

2022

8,525

186,039

Remainder

45,521

135,758

Total for all years undiscounted

773,555

1,600,081

Note:

(1)

The pricing assumptions used in the GLJ Report with respect to net present value of future net revenue (forecast) as well as the inflation rates used for operating and capital costs are set forth above.  See “Forecast Prices used in Estimates”.  The NGL price is an aggregate of the individual natural gas liquids prices used in the Total Proved plus Probable evaluation. GLJ is an independent qualified reserves evaluator appointed pursuant to NI 51-101.

 

Vermilion expects to source its capital expenditure requirements from internally generated cash flow and, as appropriate, from Vermilion’s existing credit facility or equity or debt financing.  It is anticipated that costs of funding the future development costs will not impact development of its properties or Vermilion’s reserves or future net revenue.

APPENDIX A
CONTINGENT RESOURCES

Summary information regarding contingent resources and net present value of future net revenues from contingent resources are set forth below and are derived, in each case, from the GLJ Resources Assessment. The GLJ Resources Assessment was prepared in accordance with COGEH and NI-51-101 by GLJ, an independent qualified reserve evaluator. All contingent resources evaluated in the GLJ Resources Assessment were deemed economic at the effective date of December 31, 2017. Contingent resources are in addition to reserves estimated in the GLJ Report.

A range of contingent resources estimates (low, best and high) were prepared by GLJ.  See notes 6 to 8 of the tables below for a description of low estimate, best estimate and high estimate.

The GLJ Resources Assessment estimated gross risked contingent resources with a project maturity subclass of “Development Pending” of  107.3 million boe (low estimate) to 253.6 million boe (high estimate), with a best estimate of 176.7 million boe. Contingent resources are in addition to reserves estimated in the GLJ Report.

The GLJ Resources Assessment estimated gross risked contingent resources with a project maturity subclass of “Development Unclarified” of 7.5 million boe (low estimate) to 46.1 million boe (high estimate), with a best estimate of 32.8 million boe.

An estimate of risked net present value of future net revenue of contingent resources is preliminary in nature and is provided to assist the reader in reaching an opinion on the merit and likelihood of the company proceeding with the required investment. It includes contingent resources that are considered too uncertain with respect to the chance of development to be classified as reserves. There is uncertainty that the risked net present value of future net revenue will be realized.

Table 10: Summary of Risked Oil and Gas Contingent Resources as at December 31, 2017 (1) (2) – Forecast Prices and Costs (3) (4)

Resources

Light Crude Oil &
Medium Crude Oil

Conventional
Natural Gas

Coal Bed
Methane

Natural Gas
Liquids

BOE

Unrisked
BOE

Project

Maturity

Gross

Net

Gross

Net

Gross

Net

Gross

Net

Gross

Net

Chance
of Dev.

Gross

Net

Sub-Class

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mboe)

(Mboe)

% (9)

(Mboe)

(Mboe)

Contingent (1C) – Low Estimate

Development Pending (10)

Australia

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Canada

11,918

10,818

217,576

200,317

2,081

1,977

17,879

15,803

66,407

60,337

82

%

80,740

73,403

France

13,677

12,798

940

940

—

—

—

—

13,834

12,955

87

%

15,923

14,908

Germany

—

—

19,342

16,795

—

—

—

—

3,224

2,799

77

%

4,187

3,635

Ireland

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Netherlands

61

61

4,647

4,647

—

—

1

1

837

837

81

%

1,038

1,038

USA

17,651

14,699

17,643

14,693

—

—

2,416

2,104

23,008

19,252

90

%

25,567

21,391

Total

43,307

38,376

260,148

237,392

2,081

1,977

20,296

17,908

107,310

96,180

84

%

127,453

114,375

Contingent (2C) – Best Estimate

Development Pending (10)

Australia (11)

2,440

2,440

—

—

—

—

—

—

2,440

2,440

80

%

3,050

3,050

Canada (12)

19,312

17,209

352,291

322,162

2,520

2,394

27,354

23,739

105,801

95,041

81

%

131,380

118,063

France (13)

27,054

25,229

1,245

1,245

—

—

—

—

27,262

25,437

85

%

32,027

29,891

Germany (14)

—

—

33,721

29,267

—

—

—

—

5,620

4,878

77

%

7,299

6,335

Ireland

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Netherlands (15)

121

121

13,995

13,995

—

—

8

8

2,462

2,462

78

%

3,170

3,169

USA (16)

25,289

21,060

25,924

21,589

—

—

3,554

2,960

33,164

27,618

90

%

36,849

30,687

Total

74,216

66,059

427,176

388,258

2,520

2,394

30,916

26,707

176,749

157,876

83

%

213,775

191,195

Contingent (3C) – High Estimate

Development Pending (10)

Australia

3,280

3,280

3,280

3,280

80

%

4,100

4,100

Canada

24,079

21,133

488,328

443,399

2,943

2,796

37,617

31,953

143,575

127,452

80

%

179,355

159,116

France

43,275

40,278

1,618

1,618

—

—

—

—

43,545

40,548

84

%

51,613

48,043

Germany

—

—

62,480

54,212

—

—

—

—

10,413

9,035

77

%

13,523

11,734

Ireland

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Netherlands

242

242

27,237

27,237

—

—

16

16

4,798

4,798

79

%

6,100

6,097

USA

36,411

30,320

38,218

31,826

—

—

5,240

4,363

48,021

39,987

90

%

53,356

44,430

Total

107,287

95,253

617,881

558,292

2,943

2,796

42,873

36,332

253,632

225,100

82

%

308,047

273,520

 

Resources

Light Crude Oil &
Medium Crude Oil

Conventional
Natural Gas

Coal Bed
Methane

Natural Gas
Liquids

BOE

Unrisked
BOE

Project

Maturity

Gross

Net

Gross

Net

Gross

Net

Gross

Net

Gross

Net

Chance
of Dev.

Gross

Net

Sub-Class

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mboe)

(Mboe)

% (9)

(Mboe)

(Mboe)

Contingent (1C) – Low Estimate

Development Unclarified (17)

Australia

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Canada

—

—

30,844

27,821

—

—

531

439

5,672

5,076

60

%

9,463

8,474

France

1,302

1,235

—

—

—

—

—

—

1,302

1,235

41

%

3,212

3,049

Germany

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Ireland

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Netherlands

—

—

3,120

3,120

—

—

—

—

520

520

70

%

743

743

USA

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Total

1,302

1,235

33,964

30,941

—

—

531

439

7,494

6,831

56

%

13,418

12,266

Contingent (2C) – Best Estimate

Development Unclarified (17)

Australia

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Canada (18)

—

—

60,273

53,873

60,886

57,652

6,641

5,995

26,834

24,583

46

%

58,404

53,558

France (19)

2,539

2,410

—

—

—

—

—

—

2,539

2,410

45

%

5,690

5,404

Germany

—

—

1,496

1,190

—

—

—

—

249

198

35

%

711

566

Ireland

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Netherlands (20)

—

—

18,678

18,104

—

—

32

16

3,145

3,033

51

%

6,134

5,912

USA

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Total

2,539

2,410

80,447

73,167

60,886

57,652

6,673

6,011

32,767

30,224

46

%

70,939

65,440

Contingent (3C) – High Estimate

Development Unclarified (17)

Australia

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Canada

—

—

78,561

69,281

77,410

72,283

10,104

8,744

36,099

32,338

46

%

78,918

70,761

France

3,825

3,632

—

—

—

—

—

—

3,825

3,632

46

%

8,250

7,828

Germany

—

—

2,327

1,850

—

—

—

—

388

308

35

%

1,109

880

Ireland

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Netherlands

—

—

34,682

33,807

—

—

48

24

5,828

5,659

54

%

10,743

10,441

USA

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Total

3,825

3,632

115,570

104,938

77,410

72,283

10,152

8,768

46,140

41,937

47

%

99,020

89,910

 

Table 11: Summary of Risked Net Present Value of Future Net Revenues as at December 31, 2017 – Forecast Prices and Costs (3)

 

Resources Project

Maturity Sub-Class

Before Income Taxes, Discounted at (5)

 After Income Taxes, Discounted at (5)

(M$)

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

Contingent (1C) – Low Estimate (6)

Development Pending (10)

Australia

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Canada

1,324,088

692,454

384,479

223,327

133,827

968,246

491,682

261,417

143,098

78,999

France

646,356

356,990

207,518

125,059

77,334

475,460

249,755

136,639

76,160

42,380

Germany

25,368

15,606

8,171

2,911

(697)

15,012

7,957

2,377

(1,574)

(4,234)

Ireland

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Netherlands

30,463

22,364

16,718

12,743

9,886

18,249

13,309

9,784

7,297

5,522

USA

705,352

353,098

190,899

109,417

65,316

553,775

277,974

149,964

85,463

50,507

Total

2,731,627

1,440,512

807,785

473,457

285,666

2,030,742

1,040,677

560,181

310,444

173,174

Contingent (2C) – Best Estimate (7)

Development Pending (10)

Australia (11)

81,610

50,240

31,044

19,219

11,873

17,295

7,186

1,687

(1,167)

(2,534)

Canada (12)

2,286,705

1,179,969

662,147

394,654

245,475

1,674,927

844,557

458,109

261,348

153,799

France (13)

1,414,420

759,973

439,654

268,026

170,036

1,048,109

540,491

298,625

172,711

103,017

Germany (14)

116,948

83,758

60,390

44,003

32,395

80,292

56,601

39,643

27,741

19,370

Ireland

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Netherlands (15)

81,618

57,215

41,025

29,997

22,252

43,748

28,728

18,805

12,189

7,679

USA (16)

1,275,912

623,677

342,983

205,348

130,725

1,004,012

492,135

270,653

161,886

102,881

Total

5,257,213

2,754,832

1,577,243

961,247

612,756

3,868,383

1,969,698

1,087,522

634,708

384,212

Contingent (3C) – High Estimate (8)

Development Pending (10)

Australia

162,700

104,204

67,988

45,184

30,555

54,329

31,507

18,140

10,277

5,629

Canada

3,312,383

1,649,632

923,352

557,850

354,901

2,402,861

1,167,883

630,702

364,282

219,347

France

2,463,627

1,310,231

760,541

468,396

301,212

1,827,017

934,100

520,513

306,268

186,763

Germany

302,880

217,383

159,970

120,614

92,931

212,387

151,748

110,557

82,278

62,446

Ireland

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Netherlands

205,065

142,394

103,727

78,262

60,611

110,555

74,368

52,017

37,485

27,588

USA

2,174,766

1,004,149

546,550

330,707

215,009

1,713,929

792,856

431,644

261,128

169,703

Total

8,621,421

4,427,993

2,562,128

1,601,013

1,055,219

6,321,078

3,152,462

1,763,573

1,061,718

671,476

Contingent (1C) – Low Estimate (6)

Development Unclarified (17)

Australia

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Canada

53,655

21,601

9,005

3,855

1,673

41,934

16,497

6,597

2,643

1,029

France

97,733

53,885

31,470

19,270

12,266

73,554

40,473

23,562

14,377

9,118

Germany

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Ireland

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Netherlands

13,366

8,426

5,351

3,406

2,156

6,990

3,867

1,988

855

175

USA

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Total

164,754

83,912

45,826

26,531

16,095

122,478

60,837

32,147

17,875

10,322

Contingent (2C) – Best Estimate (7)

Development Unclarified (17)

Australia

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Canada (18)

371,151

160,012

67,074

23,472

2,109

267,364

108,714

38,845

6,527

(8,792)

France (19)

180,756

91,957

50,625

29,643

18,218

134,726

67,893

36,941

21,367

12,973

Germany

472

736

724

616

487

(353)

41

132

107

45

Ireland

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Netherlands (20)

101,333

60,727

37,612

23,937

15,510

58,291

33,549

19,395

11,127

6,149

USA

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Total

653,712

313,432

156,035

77,668

36,324

460,028

210,197

95,313

39,128

10,375

Contingent (3C) – High Estimate (8)

Development Unclarified (17)

Australia

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Canada

685,972

314,515

159,130

85,452

47,007

547,002

261,869

138,799

78,569

46,086

France

292,883

138,555

73,474

42,171

25,626

217,128

101,766

53,321

30,222

18,141

Germany

4,579

4,019

3,344

2,727

2,210

2,638

2,450

2,054

1,651

1,300

Ireland

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Netherlands

244,742

135,716

82,312

53,187

35,980

141,378

76,237

44,453

27,335

17,400

USA

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Total

1,228,176

592,805

318,260

183,537

110,823

908,146

442,322

238,627

137,777

82,927

 

Notes:

(1)

Contingent resources are defined in the COGEH as those quantities of petroleum estimated, as of a given date, to be potentially recoverable from known accumulations using established technology or technology under development, but which are not currently considered to be commercially recoverable due to one or more contingencies.  There is no certainty that it will be commercially viable to produce any portion of the contingent resources or that Vermilion will produce any portion of the volumes currently classified as contingent resources.  The estimates of contingent resources involve implied assessment, based on certain estimates and assumptions, that the resources described exists in the quantities predicted or estimated, as at a given date, and that the resources can be profitably produced in the future.  The risked net present value of the future net revenue from the contingent resources does not represent the fair market value of the contingent resources.  Actual contingent resources (and any volumes that may be reclassified as reserves) and future production therefrom may be greater than or less than the estimates provided herein.

(2)

 GLJ prepared the estimates of contingent resources shown for each property using deterministic principles and methods.  Probabilistic aggregation of the low and high property estimates shown in the table might produce different total volumes than the arithmetic sums shown in the table.

(3)

 The forecast price and cost assumptions utilized in the year-end 2017 reserves report were also utilized by GLJ in preparing the GLJ Resource Assessment.  See “Forecast Prices Used in Estimates” in this AIF.

(4)

 “Gross” contingent resources are Vermilion’s working interest (operating or non-operating) share before deduction of royalties and without including any royalty interests of Vermilion.  “Net” contingent resources are Vermilion’s working interest (operating or non-operating) share after deduction of royalty obligations, plus Vermilion’s royalty interests in contingent resources.

(5)

 The risked net present value of future net revenue attributable to the contingent resources does not represent the fair market value of the contingent resources.  Estimated abandonment and reclamation costs have been included in the evaluation.

(6)

 This is considered to be a conservative estimate of the quantity that will actually be recovered.  It is likely that the actual remaining quantities recovered will exceed the low estimate. If probabilistic methods are used, there should be at least a 90 percent probability (P90) that the quantities actually recovered will equal or exceed the low estimate.

(7)

 This is considered to be the best estimate of the quantity that will actually be recovered.  It is equally likely that the actual remaining quantities recovered will be greater or less than the best estimate.  If probabilistic methods are used, there should be at least a 50 percent probability (P50) that the quantities actually recovered will equal or exceed the best estimate.

(8)

 This is considered to be an optimistic estimate of the quantity that will actually be recovered.  It is unlikely that the actual remaining quantities recovered will exceed the high estimate.  If probabilistic methods are used, there should be at least a 10 percent probability (P10) that the quantities actually recovered will equal or exceed the high estimate.

(9)

 The Chance of Development (CoDev) is the estimated probability that, once discovered, a known accumulation will be commercially developed.  Five factors have been considered in determining the CoDev as follows:

 •

 CoDev = Ps (Economic Factor) × Ps (Technology Factor) × Ps (Development Plan Factor) ×Ps (Development Timeframe Factor) × Ps (Other Contingency Factor) wherein

 •

Ps is the probability of success

 •

Economic Factor – For reserves to be assessed, a project must be economic.  With respect to contingent resources, this factor captures uncertainty in the assessment of economic status principally due to uncertainty in cost estimates and marketing options.  Economic viability uncertainty due to technology is more aptly captured with the Technology Factor.  The Economic Factor will be 1 for reserves and will often be 1 for development pending projects and for projects with a development study or pre-development study with a robust rate of return.  A robust rate of return means that the project retains economic status with variation in costs and/or marketing plans over the expected range of outcomes for these variables.

 •

 Technology Factor – For reserves to be assessed, a project must utilize established technology.  With respect to contingent resources, this factor captures the uncertainty in the viability of the proposed technology for the subject reservoir, namely, the uncertainty associated with technology under development.  By definition, technology under development is a recovery process or process improvement that has been determined to be technically viable via field test and is being field tested further to determine its economic viability in the subject reservoir.  The Technology Factor will be 1 for reserves and for established technology.  For technology under development, this factor will consider different risks associated with technologies being developed at the scale of the well versus the scale of a project and technologies which are being modified or extended for the subject reservoir versus new emerging technologies which have not previously been applied in any commercial application.  The risk assessment will also consider the quality and sufficiency of the test data available, the ability to reliably scale such data and the ability to extrapolate results in time.

 •

Development Plan Factor – For reserves to be assessed, a project must have a detailed development plan.  With respect to contingent resources, this factor captures the uncertainty in the project evaluation scenario.  The Development Plan Factor will be 1 for reserves and high, approaching 1, for development pending projects.  This factor will consider development plan detail variations including the degree of delineation, reservoir specific development and operating strategy detail (technology decision, well layouts (spacing and pad locations), completion strategy, start-up strategy, water source and disposal, other infrastructure, facility design, marketing plans) and the quality of the cost estimates as provided by the developer. 

 •

 Development Timeframe Factor – In the case of major projects, for reserves to be assessed, first major capital spending must be initiated within 5 years of the effective date.  The Development Timeframe Factor will be 1 for reserves and will often be 1 for development pending projects provided the project is planned on-stream based on the same criteria used in the assessment of reserves.  With respect to contingent resources, the factor will approach 1 for projects planned on-stream with a timeframe slightly longer than the limiting reserves criteria.

 •

Other Contingency Factor – For reserves to be assessed, all contingencies must be eliminated.  With respect to contingent resources, this factor captures major contingencies, usually beyond the control of the operator, other than those captured by economic status, technology status, project evaluation scenario status and the development timeframe.  The Other Contingency Factor will be 1 for reserves and for development pending projects and less than 1 for on hold.  Provided all contingencies have been identified and their resolution is reasonably certain, this factor would also be 1 for development unclarified projects.

 •

These factors may be inter-related (dependent) and care has been taken to ensure that risks are appropriately accounted.

(10)

 Project maturity subclass development pending is defined as contingent resources where resolution of the final conditions for development is being actively pursued (high chance of development).

(11)

 Risked development pending best estimate contingent resources for Australia have been estimated based on the continued drilling in our active core asset (see “Description of Properties” section of this AIF) using established recovery technologies.  The risked estimated cost to bring these contingent resources on commercial production is $143 MM and the expected timeline is between 6 and 8 years.  The specific contingencies for these resources are corporate commitment and development timing.

(12)

 Risked development pending best estimate contingent resources for Canada have been estimated based on the continued drilling in our active core assets (see “Description of Properties” section of this AIF) using established recovery technologies.  The risked  estimated cost to bring these contingent resources on commercial production is  $1,066 MM and the expected timeline is between 3 and 12 years.  The specific contingencies for these resources are corporate commitment and development timing.

(13)

 Risked development pending best estimate contingent resources for France have been estimated based on the continued drilling in our active core assets (see “Description of Properties” section of this AIF) using established recovery technologies.  The risked  estimated cost to bring these contingent resources on commercial production is $571 MM and the expected timeline is between 3 and 12 years.  The specific contingencies for these resources are corporate commitment and development timing.

(14)

 Risked development pending best estimate contingent resources for Germany have been estimated based on the continued drilling in our active core assets (see “Description of Properties” section of this AIF) using established recovery technologies.  The risked estimated cost to bring these contingent resources on commercial production is $75 MM and the expected timeline is between 2 and 4 years.  The specific contingencies for these resources are corporate commitment and development timing.

(15)

 Risked development pending best estimate contingent resources for Netherlands have been estimated based on the continued drilling in our active core assets (see “Description of Properties” section of this AIF) using established recovery technologies.  The risked estimated cost to bring these contingent resources on commercial production is $45 MM and the expected timeline is between 2 and 4 years.  The specific contingencies for these resources are corporate commitment and development timing.

(16)

 Risked development pending best estimate contingent resources for USA have been estimated based on the continued drilling in our active core asset (see “Description of Properties” section of this AIF) using established recovery technologies.  The risked risked estimated cost to bring these contingent resources on commercial production is $380 MM and the expected timeline is between 1 and 11 years.  The specific contingencies for these resources are corporate commitment and development timing.

(17)

 Project maturity subclass development unclarified is defined as contingent resources when the evaluation is  incomplete and there is ongoing activity to resolve any risks or uncertainties.

(18)

 In Canada, GLJ has estimated an aggregate of risked unclarified best estimate contingent resources of 26.8 mmboe for the projects outlined below. Utilizing established recovery technology, the risked estimated cost to bring these resources on commercial production is an aggregate of $323 MM with an expected timeline of 3 to 12 years.

Edson Duvernay

Based on contingencies related to corporate commitment and development timing, economic risks associated with lower liquid yields, and capital and operating cost uncertainty, GLJ has estimated risked unclarified best estimate contingent resources at 15.5 mmboe and the risked estimated cost to bring these resources on commercial production is  $242.8 MM.  The expected timeline is 3 to  7 years.

Ferrier Notikewin

Based on contingencies related to corporate commitment and development timing that is greater than 10 years, GLJ has estimated risked unclarified best estimate contingent resources at 4.7 mmboe and the risked estimated cost to bring these resources on commercial production is  $31 MM.  The expected timeline is 11 to 15 years.

Ferrier Falher

Based on contingencies related to corporate commitment and development timing that is greater than 10 years, GLJ has estimated risked unclarified best estimate contingent resources at 3.2 mmboe and the risked estimated cost to bring these resources on commercial production is  $23 MM.  The expected timeline is 11 to 15 years.

West Pembina Glauconite

Based on contingencies related to corporate commitment and development timing as well as economic risk related to capital and operating cost uncertainty due to limited horizontal development in proximity to interest lands, GLJ has estimated risked unclarified best estimate contingent resources at 3.3 mmboe and the risked estimated cost to bring these resources on commercial production is  $26 MM.  The expected timeline is 4 to 6 years.

(19)

 In France, GLJ has estimated an aggregate of risked unclarified best estimate contingent resources of 2.5 mmboe for the projects outlined below. Utilizing established recovery technology, the risked estimated cost to bring these resources on commercial production is an aggregate of $37 MM with an expected timeline of 7 to 8 years.

Charmottes

Based on contingencies related to corporate commitment and development timing, along with the project still being in the pre-development study/sourcing stage related to waterflood development, GLJ has estimated risked unclarified best estimate contingent resources at 1.3 mmboe and the risked estimated cost to bring these resources on commercial production is  $29 MM. The expected timeline is 7 to 9 years.

Chaunoy

Based on contingencies related to corporate commitment and development timing, along with a CO2 pilot project still being in the conceptual study stage, GLJ has estimated risked unclarified best estimate contingent resources at 1.2 mmboe and the risked estimated cost to bring these resources on commercial production is  $8 MM. The expected timeline is 8 to 10 years.

(20)

 In the Netherlands, GLJ has estimated an aggregate of risked unclarified best estimate contingent resources of 3.1 mmboe for the projects outlined below.  Utilizing established recovery technology, the risked estimated cost to bring these resources on commercial production is an aggregate of $51 MM with an expected timeline of 8 to 10 years.

Netherlands East

Based on contingencies related to corporate commitment and development timing along with proof-of-concept utilizing directional drilling and unknown deliverability from Zechstein carbonates, GLJ has estimated risked unclarified best estimate contingent resources at 1.5 mmboe and the risked estimated cost to bring these resources on commercial production is $25 MM.  The expected timeline is 3 to 7 years.

Netherlands West

Based on contingencies related to corporate commitment and development timing along with further study required regarding the deliverability of the Bunter sands, GLJ has estimated risked unclarified best estimate contingent resources at 1.6 mmboe and the risked estimated cost to bring these resources on commercial production is $26 MM.  The expected timeline is 3 to 5 years.

 

PROSPECTIVE RESOURCES

Summary information regarding prospective resources and net present value of future net revenues from prospective resources are set forth below and are derived, in each case, from the GLJ Resources Assessment. The GLJ Resources Assessment was prepared in accordance with COGEH and NI-51-101 by GLJ, an independent qualified reserve evaluator. All prospective resources evaluated in the GLJ Resources Assessment were deemed economic at the effective date of December 31, 2017. Prospective resources are in addition to reserves estimated in the GLJ Report.

A range of prospective resources estimates (low, best and high) were prepared by GLJ. See notes 6 to 8 of the tables below for a description of low estimate, best estimate and high estimate.

The GLJ Resources Assessment estimated gross risked prospective resources of 51.5 million boe (low estimate) to 260.4 million boe (high estimate), with a best estimate of 153.4 million boe.

An estimate of risked net present value of future net revenue of prospective resources is preliminary in nature and is provided to assist the reader in reaching an opinion on the merit and likelihood of the company proceeding with the required investment. It includes prospective resources that are considered too uncertain with respect to the chance of development and chance of discovery to be classified as reserves. There is uncertainty that the risked net present value of future net revenue will be realized.

 

Summary of Risked Oil and Gas Prospective Resources as at December 31, 2017(1)(2) – Forecast Prices and Costs(3)(4)

 

Resources

Light Crude Oil &
Medium Crude Oil

Conventional
Natural Gas

Coal Bed
Methane

Natural Gas
Liquids

BOE

Unrisked
BOE

Project

Maturity

Gross

Net

Gross

Net

Gross

Net

Gross

Net

Gross

Net

Chance of
Commerciality

Gross

Net

Sub-Class

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(MMcf)

(Mbbl)

(Mbbl)

(Mboe)

(Mboe)

% (9)

(Mboe)

(Mboe)

Prospective – Low Estimate

Prospect (10)

Australia

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Canada

185

168

66,480

61,570

—

—

4,522

3,982

15,787

14,412

34.0

%

46,435

42,388

France

5,528

4,977

—

—

—

—

—

—

5,528

4,977

21.3

%

25,904

23,366

Germany

—

—

136,066

116,769

—

—

—

—

22,678

19,462

29.0

%

78,200

67,110

Ireland

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Netherlands

—

—

44,603

41,372

—

—

50

46

7,484

6,941

10.1

%

73,823

68,723

USA

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Total

5,713

5,145

247,149

219,711

—

—

4,572

4,028

51,477

45,792

22.9

%

224,362

201,587

Prospective – Best Estimate

Prospect (10)

Australia (11)

579

579

—

—

—

—

—

—

579

579

48.0

%

1,206

1,206

Canada (12)

2,090

1,871

162,093

147,542

112,623

106,205

24,876

22,098

72,752

66,260

23.5

%

309,610

281,957

France (13)

16,335

14,636

—

—

—

—

—

—

16,335

14,636

21.4

%

76,358

68,393

Germany (14)

—

—

292,725

251,987

—

—

—

—

48,788

41,998

29.0

%

168,235

144,821

Ireland

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Netherlands(15)

—

—

89,366

82,029

—

—

96

89

14,990

13,761

10.2

%

147,256

134,912

USA

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Total

19,004

17,086

544,184

481,558

112,623

106,205

24,972

22,187

153,444

137,234

21.8

%

702,665

631,289

Prospective – High Estimate

Prospect (10)

Australia

1,462

1,462

—

—

—

—

—

—

1,462

1,462

48.0

%

3,046

3,046

Canada

2,684

2,383

231,682

209,203

147,282

136,241

38,134

32,553

103,979

92,510

23.8

%

436,843

388,697

France

35,640

32,301

—

—

—

—

—

—

35,640

32,301

22.8

%

156,320

141,671

Germany

—

—

554,429

479,424

—

—

—

—

92,405

79,904

29.0

%

318,638

275,531

Ireland

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Netherlands

—

—

160,271

148,815

—

—

171

159

26,883

24,962

10.6

%

252,881

235,491

USA

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Total

39,786

36,146

946,382

837,442

147,282

136,241

38,305

32,712

260,369

231,139

22.3

%

1,167,728

1,044,436

 

Summary of Risked Net Present Value of Future Net Revenues as at December 31, 2017 – Forecast Prices and Costs(3)

Resources Project

Maturity Sub-Class

 Before Income Taxes, Discounted at (5)

 After Income Taxes, Discounted at (5)

(M$)

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

Prospective (Pr1) -Low Estimate (6)

Prospect (10)

Australia

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Canada

207,770

95,938

44,659

19,798

7,252

169,908

75,170

32,207

11,777

1,780

France

238,004

131,320

76,140

46,216

29,224

187,762

102,964

59,117

35,418

22,032

Germany

368,323

169,166

74,634

29,008

6,565

252,131

112,397

44,221

11,701

(3,782)

Ireland

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Netherlands

274,447

125,347

68,782

42,725

28,862

145,575

61,601

29,728

15,701

8,716

USA

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Total

1,088,544

521,771

264,215

137,747

71,903

755,376

352,132

165,273

74,597

28,746

Prospective (Pr2) -Best Estimate (7)

Prospect (10)

Australia (11)

41,338

23,669

14,015

8,555

5,365

16,344

8,905

4,999

2,884

1,705

Canada (12)

1,491,712

623,324

281,364

133,988

65,665

1,065,129

430,068

182,436

78,310

31,913

France (13)

722,008

401,287

237,931

149,181

98,046

533,938

289,739

167,209

101,849

64,935

Germany (14)

1,259,830

556,044

260,954

126,408

60,705

883,031

385,237

174,225

78,544

32,534

Ireland

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Netherlands (15)

664,124

319,700

187,996

124,429

88,794

358,130

165,622

92,188

57,620

38,865

USA

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Total

4,179,012

1,924,024

982,260

542,561

318,575

2,856,572

1,279,571

621,057

319,207

169,952

Prospect (10)

Australia

136,670

74,308

43,028

26,126

16,460

57,049

30,416

17,274

10,298

6,378

Canada

2,681,315

1,109,012

521,064

267,963

146,940

1,909,850

772,257

349,756

171,101

87,888

France

1,937,405

1,011,329

573,475

347,956

223,097

1,458,826

749,093

417,797

249,512

157,614

Germany

2,751,890

1,219,651

585,356

295,653

153,056

1,969,884

858,139

400,902

194,089

93,693

Ireland

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Netherlands

1,355,100

675,317

411,776

281,254

206,125

738,129

360,566

214,793

143,533

103,140

USA

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Total

8,862,380

4,089,617

2,134,699

1,218,952

745,678

6,133,738

2,770,471

1,400,522

768,533

448,713

 

Notes:

(1)

Prospective resources are defined in the COGEH as those quantities of petroleum estimated, as of a given date, to be potentially recoverable from unknown accumulations by application of future development projects.  Prospective resources have both an associated chance of discovery (CoDis) and a chance of development (CoDev).  There is no certainty that any portion of the prospective resources will be discovered.  If discovered, there is no certainty that it will be commercially viable to produce any portion of the prospective resources or that Vermilion will produce any portion of the volumes currently classified as prospective resources.  The estimates of prospective resources involve implied assessment, based on certain estimates and assumptions, that the resources described exists in the quantities predicted or estimated, as at a given date, and that the resources can be profitably produced in the future.  The risked net present value of the future net revenue from the prospective resources does not represent the fair market value of the prospective resources.  Actual prospective resources (and any volumes that may be reclassified as reserves) and future production therefrom may be greater than or less than the estimates provided herein.

(2)

GLJ prepared the estimates of prospective resources shown for each property using deterministic principles and methods.  Probabilistic aggregation of the low and high property estimates shown in the table might produce different total volumes than the arithmetic sums shown in the table.

(3)

The forecast price and cost assumptions utilized in the year-end 2017 reserves report were also utilized by GLJ in preparing the GLJ Resource Assessment. See “GLJ December 31, 2017 Forecast Prices” in this AIF.

(4)

“Gross” prospective resources are Vermilion’s working interest (operating or non-operating) share before deduction of royalties and without including any royalty interests of Vermilion. “Net” prospective resources are Vermilion’s working interest (operating or non-operating) share after deduction of royalty obligations, plus Vermilion’s royalty interests in prospective resources.

(5)

The risked net present value of future net revenue attributable to the prospective resources does not represent the fair market value of the prospective resources.  Estimated abandonment and reclamation costs have been included in the evaluation.

(6)

This is considered to be a conservative estimate of the quantity that will actually be recovered.  It is likely that the actual remaining quantities recovered will exceed the low estimate. If probabilistic methods are used, there should be at least a 90 percent probability (P90) that the quantities actually recovered will equal or exceed the low estimate.

(7)

This is considered to be the best estimate of the quantity that will actually be recovered. It is equally likely that the actual remaining quantities recovered will be greater or less than the best estimate.  If probabilistic methods are used, there should be at least a 50 percent probability (P50) that the quantities actually recovered will equal or exceed the best estimate.

(8)

This is considered to be an optimistic estimate of the quantity that will actually be recovered.  It is unlikely that the actual remaining quantities recovered will exceed the high estimate. If probabilistic methods are used, there should be at least a 10 percent probability (P10) that the quantities actually recovered will equal or exceed the high estimate.

(9)

The chance of commerciality is defined as the product of the CoDis and the CoDev.  CoDis is defined in COGEH as the estimated probability that exploration activities will confirm the existence of a significant accumulation of potentially recoverable petroleum.  CoDev is defined as the estimated probability that, once discovered, a known accumulation will be commercially developed.

CoDev is the estimated probability that, once discovered, a known accumulation will be commercially developed.  Five factors have been considered in determining the CoDev as follows:

•

Ps is the probability of success

•

Economic Factor – For reserves to be assessed, a project must be economic.  With respect to prospective resources, this factor captures uncertainty in the assessment of economic status principally due to uncertainty in cost estimates and marketing options.  Economic viability uncertainty due to technology is more aptly captured with the Technology Factor.  The Economic Factor will be 1 for reserves and will often be 1 for development pending and for projects with a development study or pre-development study with a robust rate of return.  A robust rate of return means that the project retains economic status with variation in costs and/or marketing plans over the expected range of outcomes for these variables.

•

Technology Factor – For reserves to be assessed, a project must utilize established technology.  With respect to prospective resources, this factor captures the uncertainty in the viability of the proposed technology for the subject reservoir, namely, the uncertainty associated with technology under development.  By definition, technology under development is a recovery process or process improvement that has been determined to be technically viable via field test and is being field tested further to determine its economic viability in the subject reservoir.  The Technology Factor will be 1 for reserves and for established technology.  For technology under development, this factor will consider different risks associated with technologies being developed at the scale of the well versus the scale of a project and technologies which are being modified or extended for the subject reservoir versus new emerging technologies which have not previously been applied in any commercial application.  The risk assessment will also consider the quality and sufficiency of the test data available, the ability to reliably scale such data and the ability to extrapolate results in time.

•

Development Plan Factor – For reserves to be assessed, a project must have a detailed development plan. With respect to prospective resources, this factor captures the uncertainty in the project evaluation scenario.  The Development Plan Factor will be 1 for reserves and high, approaching 1, for development pending projects.  This factor will consider development plan detail variations including the degree of delineation, reservoir specific development and operating strategy detail (technology decision, well layouts (spacing and pad locations), completion strategy, start-up strategy, water source and disposal, other infrastructure, facility design, marketing plans etc.) and the quality of the cost estimates as provided by the developer. 

•

Development Timeframe Factor – In the case of major projects, for reserves to be assessed, first major capital spending must be initiated within 5 years of the effective date. The Development Timeframe Factor will be 1 for reserves and will often be 1 for development pending provided the project is planned on-stream based on the same criteria used in the assessment of reserves.  With respect to prospective resources, the factor will approach 1 for projects planned on-stream with a timeframe slightly longer than the limiting reserves criteria.

•

Other Contingency Factor – For reserves to be assessed, all contingencies must be eliminated.  With respect to prospective resources, this factor captures major contingencies, usually beyond the control of the operator, other than those captured by economic status, technology status, project evaluation scenario status and the development timeframe. The Other Contingency Factor will be 1 for reserves and for development pending and less than 1 for on hold.  Provided all contingencies have been identified and their resolution is reasonably certain, this factor would also be 1 for development unclarified.

•

These factors may be inter-related (dependent) and care has been taken to ensure that risks are appropriately accounted.

CoDis is defined in COGEH as the estimated probability that exploration activities will confirm the existence of a significant accumulation of potentially recoverable petroleum.  Five factors have been considered in determining the CoDis as follows:

•

CoDis = Ps (Source) × Ps (Timing and Migration) × Ps (Trap) ×Ps (Seal) × Ps (Reservoir) wherein

•

Ps is the probability of success

•

Source – For a significant accumulation of potentially recoverable petroleum, a viable source rock capable of generating hydrocarbons must exist.  The probability of a source rock investigates stratigraphic presence and location, volumetric adequacy and organic richness of the proposed source rock.  In proven hydrocarbon systems, this factor will be a 1.  This factor becomes critical when looking at frontier basins.

•

Timing and Migration – For a significant accumulation of potentially recoverable petroleum, the source rock must reach thermal maturity to generate the hydrocarbons and have a conduit with which to fill the closures that existed at the time of migration.  The probability of timing and migration investigates the movement of hydrocarbons from the source rock to the trap.  This factor evaluates the pathways and/or carrier beds, including fault systems, which can transport buoyant hydrocarbons from the source kitchen to the prospect area at a time that the trap existed.  This factor is often 1 in producing trends, but there is a possibility of migration shadows where the conduits do not fill a viable trap, which would decrease this factor.

•

Trap – For a significant accumulation of potentially recoverable petroleum, a reservoir must be present in a structural or stratigraphic closure.  The trap factor looks at the definition of the geometry of the accumulation, which is determined using seismic, gravity and/or magnetic techniques and surrounding well logs to determine the probability of a significant accumulation.  The risking of this includes examining data quality (e.g. 2D vs 3D seismic coverage) and potential depth conversion possibilities which give  confidence in the mapped trap.  Stratigraphic trap definition is used for volumetric calculations, but it is given a 1 for this chance factor as the stratigraphic risk will be captured in seal.

•

Seal – For a significant accumulation of potentially recoverable petroleum, a reservoir must be sealed both on the top and laterally by a lithology that contains the hydrocarbon accumulation within the reservoir.  It is also necessary that these accumulated hydrocarbons have been preserved from flushing or leakage.  Factors that affect top, seat and lateral seals are fluid viscosity, bed thickness, natural continuity of sealing facies, differential permeability, fault history and reservoir pressures needed to maintain a hydrocarbon column.  The probability that the accumulation is not able to be contained by the surrounding rocks is captured in this chance factor.

•

Reservoir – For a significant accumulation of potentially recoverable petroleum, a reservoir rock must be present and have sufficient porosity and permeability and be of a sufficient thickness to produce  quantities of mobile hydrocarbon.  Under this approach, encountering wet, commercial quality and quantity sandstones would not be a failure in the reservoir category, but rather in one of the other factors.  It is the reservoir along with the trap which determine the volumetrics of the accumulation.

•

Serial multiplication of these five decimal fractions representing the five geologic chance factors can be done as they are considered independent of each other.

(10)

GLJ has sub-classified the best estimate prospective resources by maturity status, consistent with the requirements of the COGE Handbook.  These prospective resources have been sub-classified as “Prospect” which the COGE Handbook defines as a potential accumulation within a play that is sufficiently well defined to present a viable drilling target.

(11)

Prospective resources for Australia have been estimated based on development timing and reservoir risk, GLJ has estimated the CoDev at 80% and the CoDis at 60%.  The corresponding chance of commerciality is 48%.  Risked best estimate prospective resources have been estimated at .06 mmboe.  Utilizing established recovery technology, the risked estimated cost to bring these resources on commercial production is $17 MM. The expected development timeline is 8 years.

(12)

Prospective resources for Canada have been estimated based on the individual prospects outlined below.  GLJ has estimated the aggregate CoDev at 27% and the aggregate CoDis at 88%.  The corresponding chance of commerciality is 23%.  Risked best estimate prospective resources have been estimated at an aggregate of 72.8 mmboe.  Utilizing established recovery technology, the risked estimated cost to bring these resources on commercial production is an aggregate of  $1061 MM.  The expected development timeline is 2 to 20 years.

Edson Duvernay

Based on reservoir risk, development timing and economic risk related to capital and operating cost uncertainty, GLJ has estimated the CoDev at 19% and the CoDis at 90%.  The corresponding chance of commerciality is 17%.  Risked best estimate prospective resources have been estimated at 33.6 mmboe and the risked estimated cost to bring these resources on commercial production is  $638 MM with an expected timeline of 7 to 14 years.

Wilrich Prospect:

Based on reservoir risk, development timing and limited Wilrich development on the land base, GLJ has estimated the CoDev at 35% and the CoDis at 85%.  The corresponding chance of commerciality is 30%.  Risked best estimate prospective resources have been estimated at 22.2 mmboe and the risked estimated cost to bring these resources on commercial production is  $218 MM with an expected timeline of 2 to 9 years.

West Pembina Glauconite Prospect:

Based on chance of discovery risk due to uncertainty regarding threshold for reservoir quality to support commercial development of resources with horizontal drilling, along with economic risk related to capital and operating cost uncertainty due to limited horizontal development in proximity to interest lands and chance of development risk related to corporate commitment and development timing.  GLJ has estimated the CoDev at 34% and the CoDis at 90%.  The corresponding chance of commerciality is 31%.  Risked best estimate prospective resources have been estimated at 6.2 mmboe and the risked estimated cost to bring these resources on commercial production is  $53 MM with an expected timeline of 6 to 12 years.

Drayton Valley Notikewin Prospect:

Based on reservoir risk and development timing, GLJ has estimated the CoDev at 70% and the CoDis at 85%.  The corresponding chance of commerciality is 60%.  Risked best estimate prospective resources have been estimated at 4.6 mmboe and the risked estimated cost to bring these resources on commercial production is $66 MM.  The expected development timeline is 9 to 11 years.

Saskatchewan Prospects

Based on reservoir risk and development timing, GLJ has estimated the CoDev at 90% and the CoDis at 80%.  The corresponding chance of commerciality is 72%.  Risked best estimate prospective resources have been estimated at 3.3 mmboe and the risked estimated cost to bring these resources on commercial production is $60 MM with an expected timeline of 7 to 11 years.

Ferrier Falher Prospect

Based on reservoir risk and development timing, GLJ has estimated the CoDev at 60% and the CoDis at 90%.  The corresponding chance of commerciality is 54%.  Risked best estimate prospective resources have been estimated at 2.7 mmboe and the risked estimated cost to bring these resources on commercial production is $23 MM with an expected timeline of 15 to 20 years.

Utikuma Gilwood Prospect

Based on reservoir risk, development timing and limited Gilwood development in the area, GLJ has estimated the CoDev at 60% and the CoDis at 50%.  The corresponding chance of commerciality is 30%.  Risked best estimate prospective resources have been estimated at 0.2 mmboe and the risked estimated cost to bring these resources on commercial production is $3 MM with an expected timeline of 3 to 9 years.

(13)

Prospective resources for France have been estimated based on the individual prospects outlined below. GLJ has estimated the aggregate CoDev at 74% and the aggregate CoDis at 28%.  The corresponding chance of commerciality is 21%.  Risked best estimate prospective resources have been estimated at an aggregate of 16.3.  Utilizing established recovery technology, the risked estimated cost to bring these resources on commercial production is an aggregate of  $380 MM.  The expected development timeline is 1 to 13 years.

Seebach Prospect

Based on risks associated with seal, trap, reservoir and charge along with development timing, GLJ has estimated the CoDev at 75% and the CoDis at 18%. The corresponding chance of commerciality is 14%.

Risked best estimate prospective resources have been estimated at 7.8 mmboe and the risked estimated cost to bring these resources on commercial production is  $40 MM with an expected timeline of 5 to 7 years.

Rachee Prospect

Based on risk of closure and data quality along with development timing, GLJ has estimated the CoDev at 80% and the CoDis at 80%. The corresponding chance of commerciality is 64%. Risked best estimate prospective resources have been estimated at 3.4 mmboe and the risked estimated cost to bring these resources on commercial production is  $233 MM with an expected timeline of 9 to 13 years.

Malnoue Prospect

Based on reservoir, structure and trap risk along with development timing, GLJ has estimated the CoDev at 70% and the CoDis at 38%. The corresponding chance of commerciality is 27%. Risked best estimate prospective resources have been estimated at 1.4 mmboe and the risked estimated cost to bring these resources on commercial production is  $35 MM with an expected timeline of 8 to 12 years.

West Lavergne Prospect

Based on structure risk and development timing GLJ has estimated the CoDev at 80% and the CoDis at 70%. The corresponding chance of commerciality is 56%. Risked best estimate prospective resources have been estimated at 1.2 mmboe and the risked estimated cost to bring these resources on commercial production is  $7 MM with an expected timeline of 4 years.

Champotran Prospect

Based on reservoir risk and development timing, GLJ has estimated the CoDev at 80% and the CoDis at 67%. The corresponding chance of commerciality is 54%. Risked best estimate prospective resources have been estimated at 0.9 mmboe and the risked estimated cost to bring these resources on commercial production is  $21 MM with an expected timeline of 1 to 11 years.

Vulaines Prospect

Based on reservoir and structure risk along with development timing, GLJ has estimated the CoDev at 80% and the CoDis at 40%. The corresponding chance of commerciality is 32%. Risked best estimate prospective resources have been estimated at 0.6 mmboe and the risked estimated cost to bring these resources on commercial production is  $14 MM with an expected timeline of 7 to 9 years.

Charmottes Prospect

Based on reservoir risk and development timing, GLJ has estimated the CoDev at 60% and the CoDis at 50%. The corresponding chance of commerciality is 30%. Risked best estimate prospective resources have been estimated at 0.5 mmboe and the risked estimated cost to bring these resources on commercial production is  $19 MM with an expected timeline of 10 to 12 years.

Bernet Prospect

Based on risks associated with reservoir, seal and trap along with economic factors, and development timing, GLJ has estimated the CoDev at 50% and the CoDis at 65%. The corresponding chance of commerciality is 33%. Risked best estimate prospective resources have been estimated at 0.3 mmboe and the risked estimated cost to bring these resources on commercial production is  $7 MM with an expected timeline of 4 to 5 years.

Vert Le Grand Prospect

Based on reservoir and structure risk along with development timing, GLJ has estimated the CoDev at 70% and the CoDis at 28%. The corresponding chance of commerciality is 20%. Risked best estimate prospective resources have been estimated at 0.2 mmboe and the risked estimated cost to bring these resources on commercial production is  $4 MM with an expected timeline of 4 to 5 years.

Les Genets Prospect

Based on reservoir, seal and closure risk, along with economic factors and development timing, GLJ has estimated the CoDev at 60% and the CoDis at 16%. The corresponding chance of commerciality is 10%. Risked best estimate prospective resources have been estimated at 0.1 mmboe and the risked estimated cost to bring these resources on commercial production is  $1 MM with an expected timeline of 8 years.

North Acacias Prospect

Based on reservoir, seal and trap risk, along with economic factors and development timing, GLJ has estimated the CoDev at 70% and the CoDis at 39%. The corresponding chance of commerciality is 27%. Risked best estimate prospective resources have been estimated at 0.07 mmboe and the risked estimated cost to bring these resources on commercial production is  $1 MM with an expected timeline of 4 to 5 years.

(14)

Prospective resources for Germany have been estimated based on the individual prospects outlined below. GLJ has estimated the aggregate CoDev at 70% and the aggregate CoDis at 42%. The corresponding chance of commerciality is 29%. Risked best estimate prospective resources have been estimated at an aggregate of 48.8 mmboe. Utilizing established recovery technology, the risked estimated cost to bring these resources on commercial production is an aggregate of 313.4 MM. The expected development timeline is 1 to 13 years.

Wisselshorst A Prospect

Based on seal and trap risk along with development timing , GLJ has estimated the CoDev at 90%, and the CoDisc at 58%. The corresponding chance of commerciality is 52%. Risked Best Estimate Prospective resources have been estimated at 13.5 mmboe and the risked estimated cost to bring these resources on commercial production is  $85.5MM with an expected timeline of 2 to 9 years.

Ihlow Prospect

Based on reservoir, seal and trap risk along with development timing, GLJ has estimated the CoDev at 71%, and the CoDisc at 51%. The corresponding chance of commerciality is 36%. Risked Best Estimate Prospective resources have been estimated at 6.6 mmboe and the risked estimated cost to bring these resources on commercial production is  $46.6MM with an expected timeline of 5 to 7 years.

Wisselshorst B Prospect

Based on reservoir, seal and trap risk along with development timing, GLJ has estimated the CoDev at 90%, and the CoDisc at 50%. The corresponding chance of commerciality is 45%. Risked Best Estimate Prospective resources have been estimated at 5.5 mmboe and the risked estimated cost to bring these resources on commercial production is  $42.7MM with an expected timeline of 5 to 12 years.

Weissenmoor South

Based on reservoir and trap risk along with development timing, GLJ has estimated the CoDev at 90%, and the CoDisc at 36%. The corresponding chance of commerciality is 32%. Risked Best Estimate Prospective resources have been estimated at 4.2 mmboe and the risked estimated cost to bring these resources on commercial production is  $15.9MM with an expected timeline of 3 to 8 years.

Simonswolde South Prospect

Based on reservoir, seal and trap risk along with development timing , GLJ has estimated the CoDev at 71%, and the CoDisc at 48%. The corresponding chance of commerciality is 34%. Risked Best Estimate Prospective resources have been estimated at 4.1 mmboe and the risked estimated cost to bring these resources on commercial production is  $16MM with an expected timeline of 8 to 9 years.

Fallingbostel

Based on reservoir, seal and trap risk along with development timing, GLJ has estimated the CoDev at 90%, and the CoDisc at 29%. The corresponding chance of commerciality is 26%. Risked Best Estimate Prospective resources have been estimated at 3.4 mmboe and the risked estimated cost to bring these resources on commercial production is  $29.5MM with an expected timeline of 3 to 9 years.

Hellwege

Based on reservoir and trap risk along with development timing, GLJ has estimated the CoDev at 90%, and the CoDisc at 40%. The corresponding chance of commerciality is 36%. Risked Best Estimate Prospective resources have been estimated at 2.9 mmboe and the risked estimated cost to bring these resources on commercial production is  $16.1MM with an expected timeline of 3 to 8 years.

Jeddeloh Prospect

Based on reservoir, seal and trap risk along with development timing, GLJ has estimated the CoDev at 38%, and the CoDisc at 32%. The corresponding chance of commerciality is 12%. Risked Best Estimate Prospective resources have been estimated at 2.9 mmboe and the risked estimated cost to bring these resources on commercial production is  $23.1MM with an expected timeline of 3 to 12 years.

Ohlendorf Prospect

Based on source and trap risk along with development timing, GLJ has estimated the CoDev at 58%, and the CoDisc at 30%. The corresponding chance of commerciality is 17%. Risked Best Estimate Prospective resources have been estimated at 2.4 mmboe and the risked estimated cost to bring these resources on commercial production is  $11.1MM with an expected timeline of 9 to 13 years.

Uphuser Meer Prospect

Based on reservoir, seal and trap risk along with development timing, GLJ has estimated the CoDev at 47%, and the CoDisc at 51%. The corresponding chance of commerciality is 24%. Risked Best Estimate Prospective resources have been estimated at 1.7 mmboe and the risked estimated cost to bring these resources on commercial production is  $8.3MM with an expected timeline of 6 to 7 years.

Simonswolde North Prospect

Based on reservoir, seal and trap risk along with development timing , GLJ has estimated the CoDev at 62%, and the CoDisc at 45%. The corresponding chance of commerciality is 28%. Risked Best Estimate Prospective resources have been estimated at 1.4 mmboe and the risked estimated cost to bring these resources on commercial production is  $6.1MM with an expected timeline of 6 to 7 years.

Burgmoor Z5 Prospect

Based on reservoir, seal and trap risk along with development timing, GLJ has estimated the CoDev at 63%, and the CoDisc at 52%. The corresponding chance of commerciality is 33%. Risked Best Estimate Prospective resources have been estimated at 0.7mmboe and the risked estimated cost to bring these resources on commercial production is  $1.1MM with an expected timeline of 1 year.

Widdernhausen East Prospect

Based on reservoir, seal and trap risk along with development timing, GLJ has estimated the CoDev at 32%, and the CoDisc at 44%. The corresponding chance of commerciality is 14%. Risked Best Estimate Prospective resources have been estimated at 0.4 mmboe and the risked estimated cost to bring these resources on commercial production is  $2.7MM with an expected timeline of 7 to 12 years.

Wellie Prospect

Based on reservoir, seal and source risk along with development timing, GLJ has estimated the CoDev at 32%, and the CoDisc at 20%. The corresponding chance of commerciality is 6%. Risked Best Estimate Prospective resources have been estimated at 0.3 mmboe and the risked estimated cost to bring these resources on commercial production is  $3.3MM with an expected timeline of 10 years.

Otterstedt Prospect

Based on reservoir, seal and trap risk along with development timing , GLJ has estimated the CoDev at 46%, and the CoDisc at 34%. The corresponding chance of commerciality is 16%. Risked Best Estimate Prospective resources have been estimated at 0.3 mmboe and the risked estimated cost to bring these resources on commercial production is  $3.5MM with an expected timeline of 8 to 13 years.

Ostervesede Prospect

Based on reservoir and seal risk along with development timing, GLJ has estimated the CoDev at 23%, and the CoDisc at 25%. The corresponding chance of commerciality is 6%. Risked Best Estimate Prospective resources have been estimated at 0.1 mmboe and the risked estimated cost to bring these resources on commercial production is  $0.7MM with an expected timeline of 7 to 10 years.

(15)

Prospective resources for Netherlands have been estimated based on the factors outlined below. GLJ has estimated the aggregate CoDev at 28% and the aggregate CoDis at 39%. The corresponding chance of commerciality is 11%. Risked best estimate prospective resources have been estimated at an aggregate of 15.0 mmboe. Utilizing established recovery technology, the risked estimated cost to bring these resources on commercial production is an aggregate of 127 MM with an expected timeline of 2 to 15 years.

Prospective resources for Netherlands East have been estimated based on the individual areas outlined below. GLJ has estimated the aggregate CoDev at 25% and the aggregate CoDis at 41%. The corresponding chance of commerciality is 10%. Risked best estimate prospective resources have been estimated at an aggregate of 12.1 mmboe and the risked estimated cost to bring these resources on commercial production is an aggregate of 83 MM with an expected timeline of 2 to 15 years.

•

Chance of discovery provided for 109 prospective reservoir targets across 91 prospective locations. Risk primarily associated with presence of reservoir and seal as region proven to have adequate source, migration and timing to charge target reservoirs.

•

Chance of development risked to account for company commitment and development timing, anticipated timing for permitting in respective licenses and distance to export (i.e. pipeline/facility requirements to transport gas to sales point). Chance of development is also a function of prospect size.

•

65 prospects summed probabilistically across 13 development groups to appropriately allocate required infrastructure capital across multiple prospective targets within reasonable proximity. As probabilistic summation of the groups resulted in strong economic indicators, no further minimum economic field size calculations were applied as they were considered to have nominal impact.

Prospective resources for Netherlands West have been estimated based on the factors outlined below. GLJ has estimated the aggregate CoDev at 41% and the aggregate CoDis at 28%. The corresponding chance of commerciality is 12%. Risked best estimate prospective resources have been estimated at an aggregate of 2.9 mmboe and the risked estimated cost to bring these resources on commercial production is an aggregate of$ 43 MM with an expected timeline of 2 to 12 years.

•

Chance of discovery provided for 25 prospective reservoir targets across 21 prospective locations. Risk primarily associated with presence of reservoir and seal as region proven to have adequate source, migration and timing to charge target reservoirs.

•

Chance of development risked to account for company commitment and development timing, anticipated timing for permitting in respective licenses and distance to export (i.e. pipeline/facility requirements to transport gas to sales point). Chance of development is also a function of prospect size.

•

17 prospects summed probabilistically across 5 development groups to appropriately allocate required infrastructure capital across multiple prospective targets within reasonable proximity. As probabilistic summation of the groups resulted in strong economic indicators no further minimum economic field size calculations were applied as they were considered to have nominal impact.

 

ABOUT VERMILION

Vermilion is an international energy producer that seeks to create value through the acquisition, exploration, development and optimization of producing properties in North America, Europe and Australia.  Our business model emphasizes organic production growth augmented with value-adding acquisitions, along with providing reliable and increasing dividends to investors.  Vermilion is targeting growth in production primarily through the exploitation of light oil and liquids-rich natural gas conventional resource plays in Canada and the United States, the exploration and development of high impact natural gas opportunities in the Netherlands and Germany, and through oil drilling and workover programs in France and Australia.  Vermilion currently holds an 18.5% working interest in the Corrib gas field in Ireland.  Vermilion currently pays a monthly dividend of Canadian $0.215 per share, which provides a current yield of approximately 6.0%.

Vermilion’s priorities are health and safety, the environment, and profitability, in that order.  Nothing is more important to us than the safety of the public and those who work with us, and the protection of our natural surroundings.  We have been recognized as a top decile performer amongst Canadian publicly listed companies in governance practices, as a Climate Leadership level (A-) performer by the CDP, and a Best Workplace in the Great Place to Work® Institute’s annual rankings in Canada, France and the Netherlands.  In addition, Vermilion emphasizes strategic community investment in each of our operating areas.

Employees and directors hold approximately 6.5% of our fully diluted shares, are committed to consistently delivering superior rewards for all stakeholders, and have delivered over 20 years of market outperformance.  Vermilion trades on the Toronto Stock Exchange and the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol VET.

Natural gas volumes have been converted on the basis of six thousand cubic feet of natural gas to one barrel equivalent of oil.  Barrels of oil equivalent (“boe”) may be misleading, particularly if used in isolation.  A boe conversion ratio of six thousand cubic feet of natural gas to one barrel of oil is based on an energy equivalency conversion method primarily applicable at the burner tip and does not represent a value equivalency at the wellhead.

Netbacks and Operating Recycle Ratio are measures that do not have standardized meanings prescribed by International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) and therefore may not be comparable with the calculations of similar measures for other entities.  “Operating Recycle Ratio” is a measure of capital efficiency calculated by dividing the Operating Netback by the cost of adding reserves (F&D cost). “Netbacks” are per boe and per Mcf measures used in operational and capital allocation decisions.  “Operating Netback” is calculated as sales less royalties, operating expense, transportation costs, PRRT and realized hedging gains and losses presented on a per unit basis.  Management assesses Operating Netback as a measure of the profitability and efficiency of our field operations.  F&D (finding and development) costs are used as a measure of capital efficiency and are calculated by dividing the applicable capital expenditures for the period, including the change in undiscounted future development capital, by the change in the reserves, incorporating revisions and production, for the same period.

SOURCE Vermilion Energy Inc.

Duvernay Freehold Royalties Vermilion Energy

Follow BOE Report
  • Facebook
  • X
  • LinkedIn

Sign up for the BOE Report Daily Digest E-mail

Successfully subscribed

Latest Headlines
  • ConocoPhillips visits Venezuela to evaluate oil opportunities 
  • Discount on Western Canada Select widens
  • Trump says Iran should not charge fees to tankers going through Strait of Hormuz
  • US solicits proposals for 30 million barrels of SPR oil
  • Ovintiv Announces Closing of Anadarko Asset Sale

Return to Home
Alberta GasMonthly Avg.
CAD/GJ
Market Data by TradingView

    Report Error







    Note: The page you are currently on will be sent with your report. If this report is about a different page, please specify.

    About
    • About BOEReport.com
    • In the News
    • Terms of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Editorial Policy
    Resources
    • Widgets
    • Notifications
    • Daily Digest E-mail
    Get In Touch
    • Advertise
    • Post a Job
    • Contact
    • Report Error
    BOE Network
    © 2026 Stack Technologies Ltd.