• Sign up for the Daily Digest E-mail

BOE Report

  • Home
  • Headlines
    • Latest Headlines
    • Columns
    • Discussions
  • Plays
    • Cardium Sandstone
    • Duvernay Shale
    • Montney Shale
    • Shaunavon
    • Viking Sandstone
    • Williston Basin
  • Well Activity Map
  • Property Listings
  • Land Sales
  • M&A Database
  • Markets
    • Market Quotes
    • Canada Well Licences
    • Canada Rig Count
    • USA Rig Count
    • USA Market Data
  • Data
  • Jobs

Montana lawmakers seek more time for Keystone XL public, tribal input

November 14, 20193:20 PM Reuters

Montana lawmakers representing Native American tribal members called on the state’s congressional delegation and the U.S. State Department on Thursday to extend the public comment period for the environmental review of the Keystone XL pipeline, saying tribes were not properly consulted.

“We are particularly concerned with the lack of formal consultation with tribal governments whose natural and cultural resources could be significantly impacted,” the 10 members of the State-Tribal Relations committee wrote to Democratic U.S. Senator Jon Tester, Republican Senator Steve Daines and Republican Representative Greg Gianforte.

The letter called for the Trump administration to conduct a “more rigorous and meaningful public comment process” for its draft supplemental environmental impact statement of Keystone XI’s proposed route through northeastern Montana, whose public comment period closes on Monday.

The long-pending pipeline would carry heavy crude oil to Steele City, Nebraska, from Canada’s oil sands in Alberta, but has faced legal challenges from landowners, tribes and environmentalists.

A federal judge in Montana in August 2018 ordered the State Department to do a full environmental review of a revised route for the Keystone XL oil pipeline. He said the previous environmental analysis fell short of the “hard look” at the cumulative effects of greenhouse gas emissions and the impact on Native American land resources that was required.

The environmental impact statement will be the basis for other federal agencies to issue construction permits for construction, including one by the Army Corps of Engineers to allow the proposed line to be built under the Missouri River.

Members of the Fort Peck Reservation are concerned that the pipeline would sit beneath the spillway of the Fort Peck dam, which would make it vulnerable to the velocity of water discharge from the dam.

Democratic state Senator Frank Smith, a tribal member on the committee who represents a district on Fort Peck, said tribal members were worried that recent spills on TC’s original Keystone Pipeline in neighboring North Dakota could happen on their land and harm their water.

He said the Fort Belknap Indian Community and the Fort Peck Tribes were not given the chance to formally consult the State Department and air their concerns.

“TC Energy has a history of leaky pipelines. I don’t think their precautions are as good as they say they are,” Smith told Reuters.

TC Energy Corp and the State Department were not available for comment.

Keystone XL TC Energy

Follow the BOE Report
  • linkedin
  • facebook
  • twitter
Sign up for the BOE Report Daily Digest E-mail
Latest Headlines
  • Heavy discount widens to near the biggest in a year
  • Questerre announces resignation of Mr. Sans Cartier from Board of Directors
  • Canada weekly rig count at highest level in 9 months, up 15 to 153
  • U.S. drillers add oil rigs for first week in eight
  • Oil prices hit highest in 3 months as U.S.-China trade deal takes shape

Return to home page
OSY Rentals

About
  • About BOEReport.com
  • In the News
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
Resources
  • App
  • Widgets
  • Desktop
  • Daily Digest E-mail
Get In Touch
  • Advertise
  • Post an Announcement
  • Post a Job
  • Contribute
  • Contact
Featured In
  • CamTrader
  • Rigger Talk
Data Partner
  • Foxterra
BOE Network
© 2019 Grobes Media Inc.