• Sign up for the Daily Digest E-mail
  • X
  • LinkedIn
  • See more results

    Generic selectors
    Exact matches only
    Search in title
    Search in content
    Post Type Selectors

BOE Report

Sign up

See more results

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
  • Home
  • StackDX Intel
  • Headlines
    • Latest Headlines
    • Featured Companies
    • Columns
    • Discussions
  • Well Activity
    • Well Licences
    • Well Activity Map
  • Property Listings
  • Land Sales
  • M&A Activity
    • M&A Database
    • AER Transfers
  • Markets
  • Rig Counts/Data
    • CAOEC Rig Count
    • Baker Hughes Rig Count
    • USA Rig Count
    • Data
      • Canada Oil Market Data
      • Canada NG Market Data
      • USA Market Data
      • Data Downloads
  • Jobs

US reviews of gas-export permits slow under Biden administration

October 30, 20234:00 PM Reuters0 Comments

U.S. Department of Energy reviews for liquefied natural gas (LNG) export permits have lengthened under President Joe Biden’s administration to 11 months or more, from seven weeks, according to government data.

The delay could mean nearly completed LNG projects may not being able to supply big European buyers because of a lack of the permit. Increasing LNG exports is opposed by some U.S. industries who fear it could raise domestic prices, while environmental groups have raised concerns about continued expansion of a fossil fuel industry.

Big swaths of U.S. industry – ranging from chemicals, steel, food and agriculture – oppose unrestricted exports of U.S. gas. Export permits represent the most significant limit thus far on an industry hoping to add 50% more to U.S. export capacity by 2026.

The average time for issuing an export license for supplying the superchilled gas to some of the biggest buyers of U.S. LNG, non-Free Trade Agreement (non-FTA) countries, has climbed under the Biden administration to over 330 days from 155 days under the Obama administration and 49 days under the Trump administration, according to DOE data.

One project, Commonwealth LNG, has been waiting a year after receiving its environmental approval for a permit. Its Cameron, Louisiana, project hopes to start construction in the third quarter of next year with preliminary deals for the sale of 5 million metric tons per annum (MTPA), mainly to non-FTA countries.

“Non-FTA approval is essential for any U.S. LNG facility to operate effectively in supplying its product in a global market,” said Commonwealth LNG spokesperson Lyle Hanna.

While non-FTA approvals have taken longer recently, the company anticipates receiving its export permit in the near future and the DOE has not raised any issues or concerns with its application, Hanna said.

New Fortress Energy filed 11 months ago for a non-FTA authorization for its Altamira FLNG facility, which is near to starting production. But the 1.4 MTPA project will be unable to sell its gas to countries including the Netherlands, U.K., France, Spain and Germany.

New Fortress did not respond to a request for comment.

“We now on average, wait about 500 days for an LNG export authorization,” said Dan Brouillette, former president of Sempra’s LNG development unit and president-elect of utility lobby group, Edison Electric Institute. His measure is larger than Reuters average count for companies that have the required environmental approval in hand.

A DOE spokesperson said the agency would not comment on specific projects, but said it considers more than environmental approvals in its non-FTA decisions. It has approved non-FTA authorizations for projects representing almost 45% of the about 103 billion cubic feet per day production of domestic dry gas, the spokesperson said.

“There are many factors that can affect the amount of time the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) needs to review an application, including the issues raised by interveners in any specific proceeding,” the spokesperson said.

Non-FTA countries are the biggest buyers of U.S. LNG, but the Biden administration’s DOE has slowed decisions for economic, political and environmental reasons, says Alex Munton, an LNG analyst at energy consultancy, Rapidan Group.

The DOE “is evidently sitting on decisions because of politics,” he said. “Without these permits, projects cannot move forward. We’re heading toward 2024 elections and the Biden administration is keenly aware of the potential for a political backlash.”

(Reporting by Curtis Williams in Houston and Valerie Volcovici in Washington; Editing by David Gregorio)

LNG

Follow BOE Report
  • Facebook
  • X
  • LinkedIn

Sign up for the BOE Report Daily Digest E-mail

Successfully subscribed

Latest Headlines
  • Trump could get a lesson on Iran from an unlikely source — emus: Russell
  • Oil rises on intensifying US-Iran hostilities, threat of Red Sea closure
  • Pembina Pipeline Declares Quarterly Preferred Share Dividends and Announces Second Quarter 2026 Results Conference Call
  • Global energy security at risk if Strait of Hormuz does not open in weeks, IEA chief says
  • Cavvy Energy To Hold Conference Call And Webcast To Discuss Second Quarter 2026 Results

Return to Home
Alberta GasMonthly Avg.
CAD/GJ
Market Data by TradingView

    Report Error







    Note: The page you are currently on will be sent with your report. If this report is about a different page, please specify.

    About
    • About BOEReport.com
    • In the News
    • Terms of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Editorial Policy
    Resources
    • Widgets
    • Notifications
    • Daily Digest E-mail
    Get In Touch
    • Advertise
    • Post a Job
    • Contact
    • Report Error
    BOE Network
    © 2026 Stack Technologies Ltd.