• Sign up for the Daily Digest E-mail
  • X
  • LinkedIn
  • See more results

    Generic selectors
    Exact matches only
    Search in title
    Search in content
    Post Type Selectors

BOE Report

Sign up

See more results

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
  • Home
  • StackDX Intel
  • Headlines
    • Latest Headlines
    • Featured Companies
    • Columns
    • Discussions
  • Well Activity
    • Well Licences
    • Well Activity Map
  • Property Listings
  • Land Sales
  • M&A Activity
    • M&A Database
    • AER Transfers
  • Markets
  • Rig Counts/Data
    • CAOEC Rig Count
    • Baker Hughes Rig Count
    • USA Rig Count
    • Data
      • Canada Oil Market Data
      • Canada NG Market Data
      • USA Market Data
      • Data Downloads
  • Jobs

TransCanada taken aback by Quebec injunction over Energy East pipeline

March 2, 201610:04 AM The Canadian Press0 Comments

CALGARY – A TransCanada spokesman says the company was taken aback when the Quebec government announced it’s planning legal action over the Energy East pipeline.

Tim Duboyce says the Calgary-based firm believed issues surrounding the province’s review of the cross-Canada oil pipeline had long been resolved.

Quebec Environment Minister David Heurtel says the government sent two letters to TransCanada in late 2014 advising that Energy East must submit to a provincial environmental assessment.

Heurtel says he got no response from the company, so the government would have to ask for an injunction to force TransCanada to follow provincial rules.

However, Duboyce says there were a series of discussions with the minister’s office in early 2015 and the two sides agreed on a provincial process that would not include a full-fledged environmental impact study.

Quebec announced that process last June and hearings are to begin on Monday.

“At the time we were of the impression the issue raised in the two older letters had thus been resolved, an impression reinforced by the fact we did not receive any other indication there remained an issue until (Tuesday),” said Duboyce.

Pipelines that cross provincial boundaries are subject to a federal environmental review process administered by the National Energy Board. The federal cabinet makes the final decision, taking into account the NEB’s recommendation.

Provinces conduct their own reviews to help formulate their positions, which are considered in the NEB process.

Quebec’s move was slammed in some quarters. Saskatchewan Premier Brad Wall warned Tuesday it would be “divisive.”

But Alberta Premier Rachel Notley said after discussions with Quebec and federal officials, there’s no cause for alarm. She said it seems the Quebec government is not seeking a veto over Energy East, but rather wants to do a review similar to one Ontario did last fall.

“I am going to leave the gun in the holster until we are actually at the gunfight, and we are not there right now,” Notley said.

Follow @LaurenKrugel on Twitter

TransCanada

Follow BOE Report
  • Facebook
  • X
  • LinkedIn

Sign up for the BOE Report Daily Digest E-mail

Successfully subscribed

Latest Headlines
  • Proposed Roberts Bank oil terminal would build on expanded West Coast marine safety system
  • Cardinal Energy Ltd. Announces Monthly Dividend for August
  • Energy stocks lift TSX into positive territory as oil prices rise
  • Diesel prices surge on tightening global supply
  • Trump says the US has swept Strait of Hormuz for mines

Return to Home
Alberta GasMonthly Avg.
CAD/GJ
Market Data by TradingView

    Report Error







    Note: The page you are currently on will be sent with your report. If this report is about a different page, please specify.

    About
    • About BOEReport.com
    • In the News
    • Terms of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Editorial Policy
    Resources
    • Widgets
    • Notifications
    • Daily Digest E-mail
    Get In Touch
    • Advertise
    • Post a Job
    • Contact
    • Report Error
    StackDX
    • BOE Report Jobs
    • StackDX Intel
    © 2026 Stack Technologies Ltd.