• Sign up for the Daily Digest E-mail
  • X
  • LinkedIn
  • See more results

    Generic selectors
    Exact matches only
    Search in title
    Search in content
    Post Type Selectors

BOE Report

Sign up

See more results

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
  • Home
  • StackDX Intel
  • Headlines
    • Latest Headlines
    • Featured Companies
    • Columns
    • Discussions
  • Well Activity
    • Well Licences
    • Well Activity Map
  • Property Listings
  • Land Sales
  • M&A Activity
    • M&A Database
    • AER Transfers
  • Markets
  • Rig Counts/Data
    • CAOEC Rig Count
    • Baker Hughes Rig Count
    • USA Rig Count
    • Data
      • Canada Oil Market Data
      • Canada NG Market Data
      • USA Market Data
      • Data Downloads
  • Jobs

US judge dismisses Exxon case against activist investor over proxy filing

June 17, 20245:31 PM Reuters0 Comments

A U.S. judge on Monday dismissed a lawsuit Exxon Mobil had filed against activist group Arjuna Capital after the group had agreed not to pursue future proxy filings at the company’s annual meetings.

The lawsuit by the largest U.S. oil company had raised alarm among activists and public pension investors who argued it would muzzle debate among shareholders and public companies.

U.S. District Court Judge Mark Pittman ruled Exxon’s claim was no longer valid after Arjuna “unconditionally and irrevocably” agreed not to submit a future proposal regarding Exxon’s greenhouse gas emissions.

“The court cannot advise Exxon of its rights without a live case or controversy to trigger jurisdiction” and Arjuna’s pledge not to file similar resolution in the future “has eliminated any case or controversy,” Pittman wrote.

Pittman’s dismissal was without prejudice, meaning Exxon could refile its case in the future.

Arjuna and Follow This, a Netherlands-based environmental group, had proposed a resolution calling on stockholders to request the oil major set new targets for reducing some of its greenhouse gas emissions.

Exxon sued the pair in January and refused to drop the case after they agreed not to bring the petition forward, citing “the likelihood” the two could file similar resolutions in the future. Pittman last month had dropped Follow This from the case as the group was outside his court’s jurisdiction.

(Reporting by Gary McWilliams in Houston Editing by Matthew Lewis)

Exxon Mobil

Follow BOE Report
  • Facebook
  • X
  • LinkedIn

Sign up for the BOE Report Daily Digest E-mail

Successfully subscribed

Latest Headlines
  • CAPP response to the advancement of the Canada-Alberta MOU and industrial carbon pricing framework 
  • Birchcliff Energy Ltd. Announces Voting Results From 2026 Annual and Special Meeting of Shareholders
  • Peyto Exploration & Development Corp. Confirms Monthly Dividend for June 15, 2026
  • Spartan Delta Corp. reports voting results of annual general and special meeting of shareholders
  • Oil Sands Alliance Statement on Canada and Alberta Agreement

Return to Home
Alberta GasMonthly Avg.
CAD/GJ
Market Data by TradingView

    Report Error







    Note: The page you are currently on will be sent with your report. If this report is about a different page, please specify.

    About
    • About BOEReport.com
    • In the News
    • Terms of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Editorial Policy
    Resources
    • Widgets
    • Notifications
    • Daily Digest E-mail
    Get In Touch
    • Advertise
    • Post a Job
    • Contact
    • Report Error
    BOE Network
    © 2026 Stack Technologies Ltd.